我国引入衡平居次原则的思考
发布时间:2018-01-13 23:32
本文关键词:我国引入衡平居次原则的思考 出处:《吉林大学》2015年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:美国的衡平居次原则根据控制公司对从属公司的不公平行为,责令控制公司债权清偿居次于从属公司其他债权人。这一做法在规制关联交易上取得了很好的效果,成为其他国家和地区规制关联交易学习的典范。我国是大陆法国家,缺乏美国那样灵活、适应性强的判例法机制,如何引入该法律制度以最大限度地发挥衡平居次原则的效果,实现破产法中追求的实质公平,是立法面临的难题。本文从研究美国衡平居次原则的适用着手,结合我国已有相关法律及实践,明确我国引入这一制度的必要性和可行性,同时对我国引入衡平居次原则在立法上提出自己微薄的建议,以期更好地保护从属公司债权人的利益。 本文第一部分阐述了美国衡平居次原则的产生及适用,从股东有限责任开始,,介绍了衡平居次原则产生的原因,然后通过分析美国三个经典判例概述衡平居次原则的产生及确立过程,最后分析了美国衡平居次原则适用的主体要件以及行为要件。本文第二、三部分论述了我国引入衡平居次原则的必要性和可行性,由于我国缺少对关联企业的法律规制以及现行法律对债权人的保护不足,引入衡平居次原则势在必行,同时我国具备引入衡平居次原则的法理基础,现行法律也能与衡平居次原则相协调,且最高法院也对引入衡平居次原则做了相关尝试与铺垫。本文最后一部分结合第一部分衡平居次原则的适用分别从实体上和程序上提出了我国引入衡平居次原则的立法建议。
[Abstract]:The principle of parity in the United States is based on the control of unfair behaviour by companies towards subordinate companies. Order the control company to pay off the creditor's rights is inferior to the other creditors of the subordinate company. This practice has achieved a good effect in regulating related party transactions. China is a continental law country and lacks the flexible and adaptable case law mechanism of the United States. How to introduce the legal system in order to maximize the effect of the principle of equal tenure and achieve the substantive fairness pursued in the bankruptcy law is a difficult problem facing the legislation. This paper begins with the study of the application of the principle of equal tenure in the United States. Combined with the relevant laws and practices in our country, the necessity and feasibility of introducing this system into our country is clear. At the same time, the author puts forward his own modest suggestions on the legislation of introducing the principle of equalization of residence in our country. In order to better protect the interests of subordinated creditors. The first part of this paper describes the emergence and application of the principle of equalization in the United States, starting with the limited liability of shareholders, introduces the reasons for the emergence of the principle of equalization. Then through the analysis of the three classic cases of the United States to outline the emergence and establishment of the principle of equitable subordination, and finally analyzed the application of the principle of equal residence in the United States as well as the main requirements of conduct. Second. The third part discusses the necessity and feasibility of introducing the principle of equalization in our country. Due to the lack of legal regulation on affiliated enterprises and inadequate protection of creditors in the current law, it is imperative to introduce the principle of equitable residence. At the same time, our country has the legal basis of introducing the principle of equalization, and the current law can also coordinate with the principle of equalization. The Supreme Court has also tried and laid the groundwork for the introduction of the principle of equalization. The last part of this paper, combined with the application of the first part of the principle of equalization, puts forward the introduction of the principle of equalization in China from the substantive and procedural aspects, respectively. Legislative proposals
【学位授予单位】:吉林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D922.291.91
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 许德风;;论破产债权的顺序[J];当代法学;2013年02期
2 牛亚婷;;深石原则法律问题探析[J];法制与社会;2014年03期
3 陈明;;关联企业破产相关法律问题初探[J];法制与社会;2014年30期
4 赵吟;;论破产分配中的衡平居次原则[J];河北法学;2013年03期
5 王远明,唐智宏;论控制股东的诚信义务对我国公司法的借鉴[J];求索;2002年05期
6 唐军;;论破产撤销权[J];社会科学研究;2013年01期
本文编号:1421071
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/1421071.html