我国政府采购中第三人权利救济的研究

发布时间：2018-01-16 17:24

本文关键词：我国政府采购中第三人权利救济的研究　出处：《兰州大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：政府采购不同于一般企业和个人采购,因为前者相对后两者而言,不仅采购数量和规模都比较庞大,而且当国家经济萧条时,扩大政府采购规模也是刺激经济增长的一种重要方式。因此,政府采购的顺利进行十分重要,而要顺利进行就离不开当事人之间的互相合作。政府采购的当事人主要是供应商和采购人、采购代理机构,第三人也是供应商,即落标或未能参与竞标的供应商。总体来说,政府采购可以分为合同授予和合同履行两个阶段,在合同授予阶段,争议双方主体主要是第三人与采购人,而在合同履行阶段双方争议的主体是中标、成交的供应商和采购人。本文着重研究第三人权利救济,相对于履行阶段,我们更加侧重研究政府采购合同授予阶段。文章首先阐述了第三人含义以及第三人权利受到损害的各种原因；其次,为了借鉴域外国家或地区经验,还介绍了他们法律的一些规定,例如,欧盟的双层救济、WTO的《政府采购协定》：再次,还指出当前我国《政府采购法》中一些不足之处,比如第三人范围规定过于狭窄,投诉之前还需要经过质疑的前置性程序。最后,大胆地提出自己的一些建议,比如适当扩大第三人范围并取消前置性程序规定。最终达到救济第三人权利的目的。
[Abstract]:Government procurement is different from ordinary enterprises and private procurement, because the former is relatively large in quantity and scale, and when the national economy is depressed. Expanding the scale of government procurement is also an important way to stimulate economic growth. Therefore, the smooth progress of government procurement is very important. The government procurement parties are mainly suppliers and purchasers, procurement agencies, the third party is also a supplier. Generally speaking, government procurement can be divided into two stages: contract award and contract performance. In the contract award stage, the main parties to the dispute are mainly the third party and the purchaser. In the stage of contract performance, the main dispute between the two parties is the winning bid, the transaction of suppliers and purchasers. This paper focuses on the third party right relief, relative to the performance stage. We pay more attention to the awarding stage of government procurement contract. Firstly, the article expounds the meaning of the third party and the reasons why the third party's rights are damaged. Secondly, in order to learn from the experience of foreign countries or regions, they also introduced some provisions of their laws, for example, the EU's double relief WTO "Agreement on Government Procurement": again. It also points out some deficiencies in the current "Government Procurement Law", such as the scope of the third party is too narrow, the complaint needs to be questioned before the front-line procedures. Finally, boldly put forward some of their own suggestions. For example, the scope of the third party should be expanded appropriately and the pre-procedure provisions should be removed. Finally, the purpose of relief to the third party's rights would be achieved.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D922.2

【参考文献】