操纵证券市场侵权责任之因果关系

发布时间：2018-01-17 21:26

本文关键词：操纵证券市场侵权责任之因果关系　出处：《法学评论》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在操纵证券市场侵权领域,不宜采纳美国的事实因果关系和法律因果关系两分法,也不宜移植德国的责任成立因果关系和责任范围因果关系两分法。司法实践中,根据直接因果关系或必然因果关系标准认定操纵证券市场侵权责任是不合理的。部分学者提出的相当因果关系理论无法有效适用于操纵证券市场侵权案件。操纵证券市场侵权案件应当实行因果关系推定,其理论基础为证明责任分配的有关理论,并非美国的"欺诈市场理论"。
[Abstract]:In the field of manipulation of securities market infringement, it is not appropriate to adopt the dichotomy of factual causality and legal causality in the United States. It is also not appropriate to transplant Germany's liability to establish causality and the scope of liability causality dichotomy. Judicial practice. According to the criterion of direct causality or inevitable causality it is unreasonable to determine the tort liability of manipulating the securities market. The theory of equivalent causality put forward by some scholars can not be applied to the tortious cases of manipulating the securities market effectively. A presumption of causality shall be applied in cases of infringement in the securities market. Its theoretical basis is the theory of burden distribution, not the fraudulent market theory of the United States.
【作者单位】：中南财经政法大学;
【分类号】：D922.287
【正文快照】： 一、问题的提出我国现行有效的法律、行政法规、部门规章中,有不少条文对操纵证券市场行为进行规制,目前尚无有关操纵证券市场的司法解释。在这些法律规范中,规定了操纵证券市场行为应承担民事责任的仅有《证券法》第77条。有关操纵证券市场民事责任的法律性质,此前理论界的

【相似文献】