反垄断法分析模式的中国选择

发布时间：2018-01-17 23:30

本文关键词：反垄断法分析模式的中国选择　出处：《中国社会科学》2017年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：现代反垄断法分析模式是反垄断法适用的核心环节。中国《反垄断法》自2008年实施以来,执法和司法机关在分析模式的适用上存在差异,导致同案不同判等有悖法制统一性的后果。选择恰当的反垄断法分析模式,应兼顾经济分析和法律形式主义两方面的可能贡献,在借鉴国外成熟制度经验的同时,充分考虑当前中国反垄断法制度构成、实施机关能力和经济分析供给状况等约束性条件,确保分析模式选择与经济分析的复杂程度、实施机关的专业水平以及经济活动参与者的守法成本等相互匹配。在制度设计上,应审慎解释立法目的条款,建立适合中国国情的行为类型化处理模式,规范全面分析的分析模式的适用,发挥举证责任分配规则的作用,完善分析模式相关的配套制度并提升公权机关实施法律的能力。
[Abstract]:The analysis mode of modern anti-monopoly law is the core link of the application of anti-monopoly law. Since the implementation of Chinese Anti-monopoly Law in 2008, there are differences in the application of the analysis model between law enforcement and judicial organs. To choose the appropriate analysis mode of anti-monopoly law should take into account the possible contribution of economic analysis and legal formalism. At the same time, we should fully consider the constitution of China's anti-monopoly law system, the ability of implementing agencies and the supply situation of economic analysis. Ensure that the choice of analysis model and the complexity of economic analysis, the professional level of the implementing agencies and the cost of compliance with the law of economic activities. In the system design, we should carefully interpret the provisions of legislative purpose. To establish a behavior type treatment model suitable for China's national conditions, standardize the application of comprehensive analysis model, and play the role of burden of proof allocation rules. Improve the supporting system of the analysis model and enhance the ability of the public authority to implement the law.
【作者单位】：深圳大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金后期资助项目“价值合意与中国竞争秩序建构”(11FFX00)资助
【分类号】：D922.294
【正文快照】： 同案同判、类似情况类似处理是法治的基本要求。确保同案同判,其必要的前提之一是要有明确、确定和统一的实体制度标准。就反垄断法而言,考虑到其制度本身的特殊性,达致实体制度的统一,不仅需要在价值和规则层面达成一致,还要求分析方法和违法认定标准也必须是统一的,即要有统

【相似文献】