法律规避行为及其裁判方法

发布时间：2018-01-23 12:07

本文关键词： 规避法律虚伪表示名不副实变相以合法形式掩盖非法目的　出处：《中外法学》2015年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：我国法院在审理投融资领域的避法行为时已做到将其与虚伪表示相区别,承认避法行为的价值中性,通过归类法对不同避法行为分别处理。归类处理的过程中隐含着法律行为解释、法律解释或类推适用。但裁判文书对解释理由经常欠缺充分说明,随意处理各种解释方法的位阶关系;类推适用隐晦不清,有扩大化甚至滥用的危险。处理虚伪表示和避法行为均借助"以合法形式掩盖非法目的"、"名为实为"、"变相"等术语,容易将事实认定和法律适用混为一谈,模糊或掩盖了法律方法。法律方法上的模糊和紊乱,极大地削弱了法院对避法行为进行实质性审查和判断的理性基础,削弱了个案裁判和规则本身的确定性和可预见性。
[Abstract]:The court of our country has made a distinction between the behavior of evading law in the field of investment and financing and the expression of hypocrisy and recognized the neutral value of the behavior of avoiding law. In the process of classification, the interpretation of legal act, legal interpretation or analogical application is implied. However, the judgment document often lacks sufficient explanation of the reasons of interpretation. Dealing with the rank relation of various interpretation methods at will; The analogy applies vaguely, there is the risk of expansion and even abuse. To deal with hypocritical expression and legal evasion, the term "to conceal the illegal purpose in a legal form", "to be in fact" and "to be disguised" is used to deal with such terms as "false expression" and "disguised form". It is easy to confuse the fact finding with the application of the law, which obscures or conceals the legal method. The ambiguity and disorder in the legal method greatly weaken the rational foundation of the court's substantive examination and judgment on the evading act. It weakens the certainty and predictability of the case judgment and the rule itself.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学;
【分类号】：D923;D922.28
【正文快照】： 引言当事人为避开或者排除特定法律规范适用而采取各种策略行为(以下简称“避法行为”或“规避行为”),乃现实中的常见现象。在我国当前的投融资领域,避法行为尤为多见,且错综复杂、层出不穷。对避法行为的评价涉及法律、经济、社会、伦理等多重价值标准,颇多争议。否定论者认

【参考文献】