当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 经济法论文 >

合同视角下公司归入权研究

发布时间:2018-01-24 21:44

  本文关键词: 公司归入权 合同视角 忠实义务 附随义务 出处:《南昌大学》2016年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:公司是经法律构造、确认和授予而取得法律上的民事主体资格,成为法律上拥有权利能力、行为能力和承担相应责任能力的私法主体。在一般传统意义上,公司是一个以股东有限责任为前提,以营利为目的的民事主体。这种私法上的主体地位和独立人格是展开公司多维本质思考的逻辑起点。归入权最早起源于美国的短线交易归入权制度是证券内幕交易法律规制制度的一个重要组成部分,其出现目的在于通过对上市公司内部人的短线交易收益归入公司从而建立内幕交易的事先防范和吓阻机制,此后相继为许多国家及地区的法律所引进和借鉴。公司归入权的实质是对公司所涉及的各方利益平衡的一种制度规制,是公司中利益主体之间的发生冲突的纠纷处理,是公司内部人违反忠实义务时法律赋予公司的一项特别救济手段。其价值表现是对公司管理人危害利益行为的惩罚和对利益相关者之间的利益协调、维护公司财产的独立性和维护市场正常秩序。对于私法上的公司归入权研究,一般认为,公司归入权具有私权属性,是国家实现公司监管目标的辅助手段之一。归入权制度规制的是公司特定人员从事法律禁止的交易行为,在特定人员与公司之间重新做利益分配,针对的是私人之间利益。私法以意思自治为首要原则,规范公司控制权和维护公司各方的基本法律地位,通过拓展意思自治空间来确保股东权利配置和维护公司的整体利益,对损害股东和公司合法权益的行为进行处罚和规制。公司归入权立法改进,在适用主体上,不应局限于股东的存续时间,在发生交易时的那一刻具备资格即可,在适用对象上,不应仅包括公司董事以及高级管理人员,而应把监事纳入规制对象。
[Abstract]:A company is a subject of private law with legal capacity, capacity to act and ability to undertake corresponding responsibilities, which is recognized and granted by the legal structure, and becomes the subject of private law in the general traditional sense. The company is based on the limited liability of shareholders. The subject status and independent personality in private law is the logical starting point for the multi-dimensional essential thinking of the company. The system of subjugation of short-term transactions originated in the United States is the insider trading of securities. Easy legal regulation system is an important part. The purpose of its emergence is to establish a pre-emptive and deterring mechanism for insider trading through the inclusion of the short-term trading income of the insider of the listed company into the company. Since then, it has been introduced and used for reference by the laws of many countries and regions. The essence of corporate taxonomy is a kind of institutional regulation on the balance of the interests of all parties involved in the company. Is the conflict between the main interests of the company to deal with the dispute. It is a special relief method given to the company by law when the company insider violates the duty of loyalty. Its value is the punishment of the corporate manager's harm to the interests and the coordination of the interests among the stakeholders. To maintain the independence of company property and the normal order of the market, it is generally believed that the right of corporate ascription has the attribute of private right in the study of the right of corporate ascription in private law. It is one of the auxiliary means for the state to achieve the goal of corporate supervision. The system of subsumption regulates the transaction behavior of the company's specific personnel which is prohibited by law and redistributes the benefits between the specific persons and the company. Private law regards autonomy of will as the primary principle, standardizes the control of the company and maintains the basic legal status of all parties in the company. By expanding the autonomy space to ensure the allocation of shareholders' rights and safeguard the overall interests of the company, to damage the legitimate rights and interests of shareholders and companies to punish and regulate the behavior. It should not be limited to the survival time of shareholders. It can be qualified at the moment of transaction. In applicable object, it should not only include company directors and senior managers, but also should include supervisors into the regulatory object.
【学位授予单位】:南昌大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:D922.291.91

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 张敏;;论公司债权人对公司治理的介入——以利益相关者理论为视角[J];人民论坛;2012年14期

2 史际春;;关于公司、企业的若干考证和辨析[J];法学家;1996年04期

3 厉正宏,潘清;上市公司资产重组“真经”难念[J];w挛胖芸,

本文编号:1461101


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/1461101.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户2df18***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com