论经济法上的市场优先原则:内涵与适用

发布时间：2018-01-31 20:30

本文关键词： 市场优先原则市场基础原则国家干预与市场失灵相适应原则市场先行原则　出处：《法商研究》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在政府与市场的关系被重塑的时代背景下,谦抑干预理念符合经济法理论新发展的趋势,而市场优先原则恰是谦抑干预理念在经济法基本原则领域的映射。市场优先原则的内涵包含如下3个子原则:市场基础原则是指在任何经济领域都应当优先发挥市场机制的调节作用,国家干预应仅局限于市场失灵的范围当中;国家干预与市场失灵相适应原则是指在确实发生市场失灵的场合,国家对经济的干预也要恪守谦抑,与市场失灵的程度相适合;市场先行原则是指在既有经验和理性无法判断某一领域是否市场失灵时,应优先假设市场未发生失灵,而暂不进行国家干预。通过消费者保护中不公平格式条款的效力问题以及网约车低于成本销售的违法性问题两大范例的分析,可以折射市场优先原则在具体经济法律规则上的指导意义。
[Abstract]:Under the background that the relationship between government and market has been reshaped, the idea of modest intervention is in line with the new development trend of economic law theory. The principle of market priority is the reflection of the concept of modest intervention in the field of basic principles of economic law. The connotation of the principle of market priority includes the following three sub-principles:. The basic principle of the market means that the regulatory role of the market mechanism should be given priority in any economic field. State intervention should be confined to the scope of market failure; The principle of adaptation between state intervention and market failure is that when market failure does occur, the state's intervention in the economy should be strictly restrained, which is suitable for the degree of market failure. The principle of market first is to assume that the market does not fail when the experience and reason can not judge whether the market is out of order or not. And no state intervention. Through consumer protection in the unfair form of the effectiveness of the issue and the net car less than the cost of the illegal sale of two examples of the analysis. It can reflect the guiding significance of the principle of market priority in the specific economic legal rules.
【作者单位】：中南财经政法大学法学院;
【分类号】：D922.29
【正文快照】： 一、市场优先原则内涵的基本阐释(一)从谦抑干预理念到市场优先原则政府与市场的关系一直是经济法基础理论研究的重要课题。经济法理论起源于对市场机制可能发生失灵的现实总结,也正是由于这种理论在处于经济转轨期的我国极具实践意义,我国的经济法理论研究才能在短短30余年间

【相似文献】