价格听证中公众参与权的法律保障机制研究

发布时间：2018-02-11 05:33

本文关键词： 价格听证公众参与权平等程序　出处：《辽宁大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：价格听证作为公众参与国家价格决策活动的一种最直接的方式,在中国的引入已有十余年。1998年《中华人民价格法》首次将价格听证正式写入法律,此后,立法和实践中曾一度产生“价格听证热”。但同时,该制度在立法与实践施行过程中的问题和弊端也越来越凸显,该制度的公信力遭到质疑,“涨价会”“作秀会”等词成为公众对价格听证会的形象描述,表现了公众对此项制度的失望和不满。问题主要在于几个方面:首先,法律规定不完善,相关法律法规还停留在一些原则性规定的层面,不具有实际可操作性,尤其是在立法中对程序性规定的不重视以及程序在执行过程中的不严格;其次是价格听证实践中经营者和公众代表实际权利义务和地位的不均衡、不平等使得价格听证浮于形式,公众难以获得真正的参与权,很难让公众的参与权得到充分的发挥;再次,听证代表作为价格听证公众一方的代言人其选取的过程不规范,价格听证举行的方式以及公众参与的渠道有待于进一步规范和探索;最后是价格听证的责任机制和救济制度不完善,缺乏事后保障措施。本文的所有研究和建议都是围绕着保障公众在价格听证中参与权的方便、有效行使为目的来设计,从完善程序立法、规范听证代表的选取程序、保障公众的权利和地位、便利公众行使参与权和公众参与权的事后救济等方面,提出对公众参与权进行全方位、环环相扣的保障措施,将公众参与权的行使落到实处。只有通过种种方式,切实保护公众的参与权,让公众更有效地参与到价格听证中去,才能真正使我国的价格听证制度走出困境。
[Abstract]:Price hearing, as the most direct way for the public to participate in the national price decision-making activities, has been introduced in China for more than 10 years. In 1998, the people's Price Law of China formally wrote the price hearing into the law for the first time, and since then, There was once a "price hearing fever" in the legislation and practice. But at the same time, the problems and drawbacks of the system in the process of legislation and practice also became more and more prominent. The credibility of the system has been questioned, words such as "price increase meeting" and "show show" have become an image description of the public price hearing, which shows the public's disappointment and dissatisfaction with the system. The main problems lie in several aspects: first, the laws and regulations are not perfect. The relevant laws and regulations still stay at the level of some principle stipulation, do not have the practical maneuverability, especially in the legislation to the procedure stipulation not pay attention to and the procedure is not strict in the execution process; Secondly, in the practice of price hearing, the actual rights, obligations and status of the operator and the public representative are not balanced. The inequality makes the price hearing floating in the form, the public is difficult to obtain the real participation right, and it is difficult to make the public's participation right fully play; Thirdly, as the spokesman of the public side of price hearing, the process of selecting the hearing representative is not standard, the way of price hearing and the channels of public participation need to be further standardized and explored. Finally, the responsibility mechanism and relief system of price hearing are imperfect and lack of ex post facto safeguard measures. All the research and suggestions in this paper are designed to ensure the convenience and effective exercise of public participation in price hearings. From the aspects of perfecting the procedural legislation, standardizing the procedure of selecting the hearing representatives, ensuring the rights and status of the public, facilitating the public to exercise the right to participate and the relief after the public participation, the paper puts forward that the public participation right should be all-around. The interlocking safeguard measures put the exercise of the public participation right into practice. Only through various ways can the public participate in the public participation rights and participate more effectively in price hearings. In order to truly make our country's price hearing system out of the dilemma.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D922.294

【相似文献】