气候治理视角下碳关税法律问题研究
发布时间:2018-02-20 07:39
本文关键词: 气候治理 碳关税 碳汇 碳税 出处:《烟台大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:随着经济学和气象学研究的不断深入,各国政府通过气候治理理论和大气数据看到了近几十年来人类活动对气候的影响,同时认识到了气候异常的治理不仅需要一国内部经济立法的规制,还需要国家间贸易规则的共同努力。以美国为主的西方发达国家率先考虑实施碳关税来解决国际市场的竞争问题和碳泄漏问题。碳关税的形成背景,主要涉及国际经贸的发展情况、全球气候异常的到来以及国际气候谈判对气候变化的回应。在界定碳关税概念的基础上,归结出碳关税的属性:国际气候治理措施和国际贸易规制措施。在阐明法、美、欧盟碳关税立法之基础上,从国际气候治理正义和公平价值的角度以及WTO框架下对碳关税的正当性予以分析。根据近年来我国出口货物的相关数据评估了碳关税对我国经贸的负面效应:丧失了“中国制造”的优势、减缓了国内经济发展的速度。造成负面效应的成因包括:发达国家争夺环保“话语权”和现阶段我国的竞争力不足。针对上述负面效应,我国应分别从国际法和国内法两个角度予以有效应对。国际法层面:积极构建贸易自由化与环境保护的协调机制;有效利用WTO规则解决贸易摩擦。国内法层面:完善国内气候治理的法律制度;完善国内低碳发展的法律制度。
[Abstract]:With the deepening of economic and meteorological research, governments have seen the impact of human activities on climate in recent decades through climate governance theory and atmospheric data. Recognizing at the same time that the governance of climate anomalies requires not only the regulation of a country's internal economic legislation, We also need to work together on the rules of trade between countries. Western developed countries, dominated by the United States, have taken the lead in considering the implementation of carbon tariffs to solve the problem of competition and carbon leakage in the international market. Mainly related to the development of international economy and trade, the arrival of global climate anomalies and the response of international climate negotiations to climate change. On the basis of defining the concept of carbon tariffs, The nature of carbon tariff: international climate control measures and international trade regulation measures. On the basis of clarifying the law, the United States, the European Union carbon tariff legislation, From the perspective of justice and fair value of international climate governance and the legitimacy of carbon tariff under the framework of WTO, this paper evaluates the negative effect of carbon tariff on China's economy and trade according to the relevant data of China's export goods in recent years. Lost the advantage of "made in China", This has slowed down the pace of domestic economic development. The causes of the negative effects include: the developed countries are fighting for the "right to speak" for environmental protection and the competitiveness of our country at the present stage is insufficient. In view of the above-mentioned negative effects, China should deal with it effectively from the two angles of international law and domestic law respectively. The aspects of international law are: constructing the coordination mechanism of trade liberalization and environmental protection; Effective use of WTO rules to solve trade friction. domestic legal level: improve the domestic legal system of climate governance; improve the domestic low-carbon development of the legal system.
【学位授予单位】:烟台大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D922.68;D922.22
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 赵鑫鑫;;论气候变化法中区域环境治理体系的建立[J];中国政法大学学报;2016年03期
2 曾文革;冯帅;;巴黎协定能力建设条款:成就、不足与展望[J];环境保护;2015年24期
3 黄颖;丁泓宇;;全球气候治理视角下的碳关税国际法属性及其发展趋势[J];昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版);2014年06期
4 陈红彦;;碳关税的合法性分析——以边境税收调整的适格性为视角[J];法商研究;2013年04期
5 陈柳钦;;金融支持低碳经济发展问题探讨[J];当代经济研究;2013年02期
6 彼得·纽厄尔;马修·帕特森;王聪聪;;气候资本主义:低碳经济的政治学[J];中国地质大学学报(社会科学版);2013年01期
7 林伯强;李爱军;;碳关税的合理性何在?[J];经济研究;2012年11期
8 闵惜琳;;低碳基础指标测算综述[J];科技管理研究;2012年15期
9 贺小勇;;《关税及贸易总协定》第20条与“议定书”的法律关系辨析——理性看待“中国原材料案”裁决[J];法学;2012年06期
10 谭伟文;文礼章;仝宝生;沈佐锐;高觅;;生态足迹理论综述与应用展望[J];生态经济;2012年06期
,本文编号:1519113
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/1519113.html