反垄断法地方实施制度的完善——基于美国的经验

发布时间：2018-03-05 13:41

本文选题：反垄断法　切入点：地方实施　出处：《江西社会科学》2017年10期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：从反垄断立法和执法的历史来看,美国较早地提出并建成了联邦与州两个层面的反托拉斯法执法体制机制。美国反垄断的执法经验表明,反垄断法的有效实施不能仅靠中央层面执法机构的推动,还必须调动地方执法机构的积极性,使中央与地方反垄断执法机构紧密配合,才能促进有效的市场竞争和保护消费者利益的反垄断立法目的。我国反垄断法已实施十年,从整体来看,反垄断执法的案件数量不大,地方执法机构反垄断执法的积极性不高,严重影响我国反垄断法的实施效果。为此,需明确地方执法机构的执法权,构建中央与地方反垄断执法协作机制,建立特定机制,确保反垄断法基本价值融入地方立法。
[Abstract]:Judging from the history of antitrust legislation and enforcement, the United States has put forward and built the antitrust law enforcement system at the federal and state levels earlier. The effective implementation of the anti-monopoly law should not only depend on the promotion of the law enforcement agencies at the central level, but also mobilize the enthusiasm of the local law enforcement agencies so that the central and local anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies can cooperate closely. In order to promote effective market competition and to protect the interests of consumers, China has been implementing anti-monopoly law for ten years. On the whole, the number of anti-monopoly law enforcement cases is not large, and the enthusiasm of local law enforcement agencies for anti-monopoly law enforcement is not high. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the law enforcement power of local law enforcement agencies, to establish the cooperation mechanism between central and local antitrust law enforcement, to establish specific mechanism to ensure the integration of the basic value of anti-monopoly law into local legislation.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学不动产研究中心;江西财经大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“互联网行业反垄断问题研究”(13BFX118) 江西省高校人文社会科学重点研究基地招标项目“产业政策与公平竞争审查制度研究”(JD16045)
【分类号】：D922.294

【相似文献】