论破产债权人会议议事规则的完善

发布时间：2018-03-18 06:42

本文选题：破产　切入点：债权人会议　出处：《扬州大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：债权人会议,是由依法申报债权的债权人组成,以保障债权人共同利益为目的,为实现债权人的破产程序参与权,讨论决定有关破产事宜,表达债权人意志,协调债权人行为的破产议事机构。债权人会议议事规则是指债权人会议在召集和召开的过程中,在提议、召集通知、主持、协商、表决、决议、记录七大方面理应遵守的具体规则以及债权人、管理人、法院这三大主体如何行使监督权的机制。近年来,我国企业破产案件不断增多,各种规模的债权人会议在全国各地召开,债权人会议议事规则不断地被应用到实践中去。目前,随着债权人会议的多次召集与召开,我们在实践中发现了诸多问题,这种种问题的出现都是债权人会议议事规则不完善的体现。本文着眼于分析债权人会议实践中的困境,明确债权人会议议事规则现行法律规定,通过实证研究和比较分析,找出我国现行议事规则不完善的原因,并对如何完善债权人会议议事规则提出了相应的完善措施。本文分为四大部分:第一部分:引言主要是发现问题,并从提议、召集通知、主持、协商、表决、决议、记录、监督这八大方面简要介绍了国内内外关于债权人会议议事规则的法律规定与研究现状;第二部分:以宁夏银星多晶硅有限责任公司破产案件为例,通过分析个案,对债权人会议召集与召开的现状进行研究,发现债权人会议议事规则的不完善之处;第三部分:从制度设计瑕疵,管理人专业性、实践经验、自我定位存在问题,法院在破产实践中存在问题以及债权人思想观念不当、缺乏理智这四大角度出发,分析了债权人会议议事规则不完善的原因;第四部分:针对债权人会议议事规则不完善的原因,从制度设计、管理人、法院、债权人这四大角度,分别提出相对应的完善措施:在制度设计方面,适当借鉴外国法律,完善已有的议事规则,增设目前没有的议事规则;在实践方面,从管理人的指定方式、管理人的资格、管理人的自我提升、管理人的自我定位、法官专业素养的提升、法官的中立性保持以及债权人依法维权意识的培养这些具体角度出发提出完善措施。
[Abstract]:The creditors' meeting is composed of creditors who declare their claims according to law. In order to protect the common interests of creditors, to realize the creditors' right to participate in bankruptcy proceedings, to discuss and decide on matters relating to bankruptcy, and to express the will of creditors, The rules of procedure of the creditors' meeting refer to the proposal, call notice, chair, consultation, vote and resolution of the creditors' meeting in the process of convening and convening, To record the specific rules that should be observed by the seven major parties and the mechanism of how the creditors, administrators and courts are supposed to exercise their supervisory powers. In recent years, the number of bankruptcy cases of enterprises in our country has been increasing. Creditor meetings of various sizes have been held throughout the country, and the rules of procedure of creditors' meetings have been continuously applied to practice. At present, with the convening and convening of creditor meetings many times, we have found many problems in practice. The emergence of these problems is a reflection of the imperfection of the rules of procedure of the creditors' meeting. This paper focuses on analyzing the difficulties in the practice of the creditors' meeting, clarifies the existing legal provisions of the rules of procedure of the creditors' meeting, and through empirical research and comparative analysis, This article is divided into four parts: the first part: the introduction is mainly to find out the problems, and from the proposal, call notice, Presided over, negotiated, voted, decided, recorded, supervised these eight aspects briefly introduced the domestic and foreign rules of procedure of the creditors meeting of the legal provisions and research status; The second part: taking the bankruptcy case of Ningxia Yinxing Polysilicon Co., Ltd. as an example, through the analysis of the case, the paper studies the present situation of the creditors' meeting convening and convening, and finds out the imperfections of the rules of procedure of the creditors' meeting. The third part: from the system design flaw, the administrator specialized, the practice experience, the self-positioning existence question, the court exists the question in the bankruptcy practice and the creditor's idea is improper, lacks the reason these four big angles, Part 4th: aiming at the reasons of the imperfection of the rules of procedure of the creditors' meeting, from the four angles of system design, administrator, court, creditor, the author analyzes the reasons of the imperfection of the rules of procedure of the creditors' meeting. In the aspect of system design, we should draw lessons from foreign laws, perfect the existing rules of procedure and add the rules of procedure that are not available at present. In practice, we should consider the ways of appointing managers and the qualifications of managers. The self-promotion of manager, the self-positioning of administrator, the improvement of judge's professional quality, the neutrality of judge and the cultivation of creditor's consciousness of protecting rights according to law are put forward.
【学位授予单位】：扬州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.291.92

【相似文献】