俄罗斯北极航道国内法规与《联合国海洋法公约》的分歧及化解途径

发布时间：2018-03-21 11:51

本文选题：《联合国海洋法》　切入点：北方海航线　出处：《上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：俄罗斯北方海航线是北极东北航道的一部分,随着全球气候变暖,北方海航线有可能成为具有重大潜在经济价值的贸易路线。冷战结束后,俄罗斯为了强化对北方海航线的控制和管理,制定了有关北方海航线的国内法规。问题是俄罗斯的相关国内法规与《联合国海洋法公约》存在严重分歧。这些分歧产生的原因一方面是由于两者立法旨趣不同,俄国内法规的立法宗旨是最大化其自身的国家利益,而《公约》的缔结则是平衡保障所有缔约国权益的结果;另一方面是由于国际法与国内法的优先适用问题,即俄罗斯作为《公约》缔约方,应该遵守《公约》,但其国内法规却与《公约》存在分歧并被实际执行。目前来看,化解两者分歧的途径也可能有两种:其一,俄罗斯将《公约》的相关规定内化到其国内法规中;其二,俄罗斯接受根据《公约》相关规定进行的仲裁或调解。
[Abstract]:Russia's northern sea route is part of the North East Passage of the Arctic. With global warming, the northern sea route is likely to become a trade route of great potential economic value. In order to strengthen the control and management of the northern sea route, The problem is that there are serious differences between the relevant domestic laws and regulations of Russia and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The reason for these differences is, on the one hand, that they have different legislative interests. The legislative purpose of Russia's domestic laws and regulations is to maximize its own national interests, while the conclusion of the Convention is the result of the balanced protection of the rights and interests of all States parties; on the other hand, it is due to the priority of the application of international law and domestic law. That is, Russia, as a party to the Convention, should abide by the Convention, but its domestic laws and regulations are different from the Convention and implemented in practice. At present, there may be two ways to resolve the differences between the two: first, Russia internalizes the relevant provisions of the Convention into its domestic laws and regulations; secondly, Russia accepts arbitration or conciliation under the relevant provisions of the Convention.
【作者单位】：上海政法学院国际事务与公共管理学院;
【基金】：上海政法学院上海市法学高原学科(国际法与国际政治方向) 创新性学科团队项目
【分类号】：D993.5;D951.2;DD912.29

【相似文献】