原则性禁止转售价格维持的立法正确性及其实施改进

发布时间：2018-03-22 02:16

本文选题：转售价格维持　切入点：原则禁止　出处：《政治与法律》2017年11期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：转售价格维持竞争效果认定的模棱两可给依反垄断法对其的恰当处置带来了挑战。美国的Leegin案确立的转售价格维持之合理原则的正当性是有限度的,图景误置暗藏着消解我国反垄断法制统一性的危机。我国《反垄断法》原则性禁止排除、限制竞争的转售价格维持绝不是立法错误,对其适用的难点在于分析方法构造。立足本土,我国需要对有关转售价格维持"原则禁止+例外豁免"的规范意义及其分析方法形成自觉理解和自主选择。对转售价格维持采取可抗辩的违法推定的分析方法具备适合性,但其依据不是"原则禁止+例外豁免"下的逻辑推导。为了避免可抗辩的违法推定陷入本身违法的陷阱,应着力构建转售价格维持的抗辩体系和抗辩清单,以此保障抗辩实质化。对转售价格维持执法案件的事后评估有助于执法政策优化和分析方法改进。
[Abstract]:The ambiguity of maintaining the competitive effect of resale price brings a challenge to the proper treatment of resale price under antitrust law. The reasonable principle of resale price maintenance established in the Leegin case in the United States is limited. The picture misplaced hidden the crisis of dispelling the unity of the anti-monopoly law in our country. Our country's "Anti-monopoly Law" prohibits the elimination of principle and restricts the resale price maintenance of competition is not a legislative mistake. The difficulty to apply to it lies in the construction of analytical methods. Our country needs to form a conscious understanding and independent choice on the normative meaning of "principle forbidding exceptional exemption" and its analytical method about the maintenance of resale price, and the analysis method of adopting a defensible presumption of illegality for the maintenance of resale price is suitable. But its basis is not the logical derivation under "principle forbids exception immunity". In order to avoid the defensible presumption of violation falling into its own illegal trap, it is necessary to construct the defense system and defense list of resale price maintenance. In order to ensure the substantiation of the defense, the post-evaluation of the law enforcement case is helpful to the optimization of the enforcement policy and the improvement of the analytical method.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学;
【分类号】：D922.294

【相似文献】