美欧反垄断法中二线竞争损害认定及其对我国的启示

发布时间：2018-03-24 13:36

  本文选题：二线竞争损害　切入点：经济效率　出处：《价格理论与实践》2017年06期

【摘要】：反垄断法对价格歧视行为规制的核心要件是竞争损害,竞争损害根据受害竞争者所在市场的不同划分为一线竞争损害和二线竞争损害。对于二线竞争损害的认定,美国反垄断司法实践已基本废弃竞争者保护方法,采用市场损害认定,使竞争损害评价的法学与经济学理论趋于一致,而欧盟反垄断司法实践仍适用形式方法的本身违法规则,以竞争者损害代替竞争损害,不仅在理论上致使法学与经济学的割裂,在实践中也多有缺陷。我国执法与司法实践应借鉴美国反垄断法竞争损害认定的经济效率基础,克服欧盟法律形式主义的弊端。
[Abstract]:The core element of the regulation of price discrimination in anti-monopoly law is competition damage, which is divided into first-line competition damage and second-line competition damage according to the market where the injured competitors are located. The judicial practice of antitrust in the United States has basically abandoned the method of protection of competitors and adopted market damage determination, which makes the theory of law and economics of evaluation of competition damage converge, while the anti-monopoly judicial practice of the European Union still applies the illegal rules of the formal method. Replacing the competition damage with the competitor damage not only leads to the separation of law and economics in theory, but also has many defects in practice. Our law enforcement and judicial practice should draw lessons from the economic efficiency basis of the recognition of competition damage in American anti-monopoly law. To overcome the drawbacks of EU legal formalism.
【作者单位】： 宜春学院政法学院;
【分类号】：D971.2;DD912.29
，

本文编号：1658532