瑕疵股东会决议效力问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-29 09:41

本文选题：无效决议　切入点：决议不存在　出处：《沈阳师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：股东会决议是公司效力最高的决议,当股东会决议存在瑕疵时,不但会影响公司本身的利益,更能影响到公司股东和公司利害关系人的利益,甚至有可能会影响到公司的决策以及公司未来的发展。为维护公司、股东和公司债权人的利益,我国《公司法》规定了瑕疵股东会决议的诉讼救济程序。近几年来,随着国家和公司的发展,司法实践中出现大量的不属于诉讼救济程序的情形,其原因是《公司法》并没有认识到决议无效之诉和决议可撤销之诉的法律行为本质。本文以分析李某诉慈尚食品加工有限责任公司股东会决议效力纠纷案为前提,结合我国瑕疵股东会决议诉讼救济程序的学术理论和我国《公司法解释四(征求意见稿)》的法律规定,针对我国瑕疵股东会决议诉讼救济程序的类型化厘定、诉讼主体的界定和诉讼起诉期间限制所存在的问题以及给出合理的建议。本文希望通过对以上问题的分析能够使公司面临瑕疵股东会决议时能够清晰的分辨出诉讼救济程序类型、其是否具有提起诉讼的主体资格及其被诉主体和其是否超过起诉期间的限制,最主要的是规范有限责任公司股东会的程序,避免产生瑕疵情形和减少诉讼成本。首先,本文将对李某诉慈尚食品加工公司股东会效力纠纷案进行相应的叙述,从中归纳出本案有关瑕疵股东会决议效力的争议焦点。其次,对于诉讼类型的厘定,先对三种诉讼类型之间的分类标准进行界定,然后通过对每一种类型所具备的情形进行详述,使当事人能够准确的分辨瑕疵股东会决议类型。同时作者通过论述我国诉讼类型理论和立法之间的区别,对我国征求意见稿提出完善意见。第三,作者将对于诉讼主体的界定和起诉期间的限制进行相应论述,使得当事人能够清楚知道其是否具有起诉主体资格和是否超过起诉期间,由于股东会决议无效之诉、不存在之诉的起诉主体和诉讼时效限制具有特殊性,作者将对此进行着重论述。最后作者希望能够通过本文合理分析理论和司法实践之间的差异,希望能为此次的征求意见稿贡献自己的微薄之力。
[Abstract]:The resolution of shareholders' meeting is the most effective resolution of the company. When the resolution of shareholders' meeting is flawed, it will not only affect the interests of the company itself, but also the interests of shareholders and stakeholders of the company. In order to protect the interests of the company, shareholders and creditors of the company, the Company Law of our country has stipulated the procedure of litigation relief for the resolution of the defective shareholders' meeting. In recent years, With the development of the country and the company, there are a large number of cases that do not belong to the litigation procedure in the judicial practice. The reason is that the Company Law does not recognize the nature of the legal action of the invalidation of the resolution and the revocable action of the resolution. This article is based on the analysis of the dispute over the validity of the resolution of the shareholders' meeting of Limou v. Cishang Food processing Co., Ltd. Combined with the academic theory of litigation relief procedure of defective shareholders' meeting and the legal provisions of our country's Company Law interpretation IV (draft for soliciting opinions), the classification of litigation relief procedure of defective shareholders' meeting resolution is determined. The definition of litigant and the problems existing in the limitation of litigation period and the reasonable suggestions are given. This paper hopes that the analysis of the above problems can enable the company to distinguish the lawsuit clearly when it faces the resolution of the defective shareholders' meeting. Type of relief proceedings, The most important thing is to standardize the procedure of shareholders' meeting of limited liability company, to avoid defects and to reduce litigation costs. This article will make a corresponding narration to the dispute case of the validity of the shareholders' meeting of Li Mou v. Cishang Food processing Company, from which we can conclude the focus of the dispute about the validity of the resolution of the defective shareholders' meeting. Secondly, the determination of the type of litigation. The classification criteria between the three types of litigation are defined first, and then the circumstances of each type are described in detail. At the same time, by discussing the difference between the theory of litigation type and legislation, the author puts forward the perfect opinions on the draft of soliciting opinions of our country. The author will discuss the definition of litigant and the limitation of prosecution period, so that the litigant can know clearly whether he has the qualification of suing subject and whether it exceeds the period of suing, because of the invalid action of the shareholders' meeting, The author will focus on the special nature of the subject of prosecution and limitation of limitation of action in non-existent litigation. Finally, the author hopes that the difference between theory and judicial practice can be reasonably analyzed through this article. Hope to be able to this request for comments to contribute their own modest contribution.
【学位授予单位】：沈阳师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【参考文献】