海上保险人对保险标的的权利

发布时间：2018-03-29 23:13

本文选题：海上保险人对保险标的权利　切入点：补偿原则　出处：《大连海事大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文主要以我国《海商法》第250条委付、第256条海上保险人全损赔偿后的权利为视角,结合1906年《英国海上保险法》的相关规定,运用比较法及案例分析法分析海上保险人在赔偿后对保险标的的权利之相关问题,并就此对我国法律的相关规定提出些许完善建议。本文除引言和结论外,共分为五个部分。第一部分初步介绍保险人对保险标的的权利的概念。该部分主要论述了保险人对保险标的的权利这一概念的演变和法理基础,并与民法上的保全代位权、物上代位权、代位求偿权进行对比分析,进一步明确其权利属性。第二部分研究海上保险人对保险标的的权利的适用情形。该部分是本文的重点章节,主要是根据我国《海商法》第250条和第256条的内容,分析在推定全损进行委付和保险人按照全损进行赔偿两种情形下该权利的适用。同时对比1906年《英国海上保险法》的相关规定,分析该权利的内容、权利取得方式和影响,并就部分损失和连续全损下保险人对保险标的的权利问题进行了分析。第三部分论证海上保险人对保险标的的权利的范围和限制。该部分为本文的重点章节,主要分析在不同保险情形下该权利的范围,并对不足额保险对该权利的影响进行分析。第四部分阐述了海上保险人赔偿后如何行使对保险标的的权利以及行使过程中与相关权利的冲突。主要论述了海上保险人在赔偿后通过主张所有权或者不主张所有权而主张纯经济利益来实现该权利。第五部分是对我国《海商法》关于海上保险人对保险标的的权利的现有规定提出些许修改建议。
[Abstract]:This article mainly regards the right after the total loss compensation of the marine insurer in Article 250 and 256 of the Maritime Law of our country as the angle of view, combined with the relevant provisions of the British Maritime Insurance Law of 1906. By using comparative law and case analysis method, this paper analyzes the relevant problems of marine insurers' rights to the subject matter of insurance after compensation, and puts forward some suggestions to improve the relevant provisions of Chinese law. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper makes some suggestions on the rights of marine insurers to the subject matter of insurance after compensation. It is divided into five parts. The first part introduces the concept of insurer's right to the subject matter of insurance, which mainly discusses the evolution of the concept of insurer's right to the subject matter of insurance and its legal basis, and the preservation of subrogation right in civil law. The right of subrogation in rem and the right of subrogation are compared and analyzed in order to further clarify the property of the right. The second part studies the application of the right of marine insurer to the subject matter of insurance. This part is the key chapter of this article. Mainly according to the contents of articles 250 and 256 of the Maritime Law of China, This paper analyzes the application of this right in the case of constructive total loss abandonment and the insurer making compensation according to the total loss. At the same time, by comparing the relevant provisions of the British Maritime Insurance Act 1906, this paper analyzes the content of the right, the way in which the right is obtained and the influence of the right. The third part demonstrates the scope and limitation of the marine insurer's right to the subject matter of insurance. It mainly analyzes the scope of this right under different insurance conditions, The fourth part expounds how to exercise the right to the subject matter of insurance after the marine insurer pays compensation and the conflict between the right and the relevant rights in the course of exercising the insurance. The fourth part mainly discusses how to exercise the right to the subject matter of insurance and the conflict between the right and the relevant rights in the course of the exercise. After indemnification, the risk person claims the right of pure economic interest by claiming ownership or not. The fifth part is about the existing provisions about the right of marine insurer to the subject matter insured in maritime law of our country. Make some suggestions for modification.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D922.284

【参考文献】