公司高管竞业禁止法律制度研究

发布时间：2018-04-01 17:32

本文选题：公司高管　切入点：竞业禁止　出处：《西南科技大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：竞业禁止制度作为公司高管忠实义务的衍生义务,其目的是为了实现对公司管理人员权力的限制,保护公司利益。伴随我国经济不断发展,公司治理问题也呈现出复杂化和多元化趋势,但我国现行公司法中关于竞业禁止制度则略显苍白,无法适应当前经济发展趋势。本文以“公司高管”、“竞业禁止义务”的概念与特征为切入点,对“公司高管竞业禁止义务”的概念与特征作出界定,通过分析比较其在大陆法系与英美法系中不同的理论基础,加深对竞业禁止义务的认识。根据公司法149条第五项内容,将其拆分为四个要件对我国竞业禁止义务做出详细解读况,了解到该义务主体范围将监事排除在外;在内容上将篡夺公司机会与同业竞争并立;在归入权的适用上,主体提起诉权动因不足等制度上的不足,限制了竞业禁止制度的效力发挥。结合我国竞业禁止司法实践情况,总结出公司高管违反竞业禁止义务后,其被认定违反义务标准不清,公司可采取的救济措施操作性弱,难以维权等司法适用缺陷之后,借鉴域外相关经验从完善竞业禁止制度与促进司法改进两方面,为完善我国竞业禁止制度提出相关建议。促进我国竞业禁止制度深化改革,实现公司自治与司法干预的平衡,保障公司及股东利益,为我国公司法的立法完善和司法实践有所裨益。
[Abstract]:As a derivative of company executives' duty of loyalty, the non-competition system aims to limit the power of managers and protect the interests of companies. The problem of corporate governance also shows a trend of complexity and diversification, but the prohibition system of non-competition in the current company law of our country is a little pale. Unable to adapt to the current trend of economic development. This paper defines the concept and characteristics of "corporate executives" and "non-compete obligation" as a starting point, and defines the concept and characteristics of "corporate executives' non-compete obligation". Through the analysis and comparison of its different theoretical bases in the civil law system and the common law system, the author makes a deeper understanding of the non-compete obligation. According to the fifth item of Article 149 of the Company Law, It will be divided into four elements to make a detailed interpretation of the obligation of non-competition in China, understand that the main scope of the obligation to exclude supervisors; in content will usurp company opportunities and competition in the same industry; in the application of the right to ascription, The lack of the motivation of the subject's right of action limits the effectiveness of the non-compete system. According to the judicial practice of the prohibition of competition in our country, the author concludes that the company executives violate the obligation of the prohibition of non-competition. After it is found to violate the obligation standard is unclear, the relief measures that the company can take are weak, difficult to protect the rights and other judicial application defects, learn from foreign relevant experience from perfecting the system of prohibition of competition and promoting judicial improvement. In order to perfect the prohibition system of non-competition in our country, the author puts forward some suggestions to promote the reform of the prohibition system, to realize the balance between corporate autonomy and judicial intervention, and to protect the interests of the company and its shareholders. It is beneficial to the legislative perfection and judicial practice of our company law.
【学位授予单位】：西南科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【相似文献】