作为补充型特别民法之海商法的丰富性与体系性

发布时间：2018-04-23 03:32

本文选题：补充型特别民法 + 商人法　；参考：《社会科学战线》2016年08期

【摘要】：民法典编纂语境下展开对作为补充型特别民法之海商法的实证分析,即便补充型特别民法大多数情境下是以单行立法的模式存在,但任其发展必然带来民法体系上的抵牾。补充型特别民法具有多样态性,且形成了自足性、分层性以及示范法效用的丰富性。补充型特别民法的丰富性不能凌驾于民法典作为市民社会基本法的地位,同时,补充型特别民法的体系要受制于其法源的丰富性所诱发的分层属性与示范法效用。故此,梳理和考察海商法的丰富性和体系性,不仅具有某种意义上的"补白"价值,而且更为现实的意义在于,补充型特别民法的体系性诉求为中国海商法典的修正与应对鹿特丹规则的影响提供了新视角与途径。
[Abstract]:In the context of codification of the civil code, the empirical analysis of maritime law as a supplementary special civil law is carried out. Even though the supplementary special civil law exists in the mode of one-line legislation in most situations, its development will inevitably lead to contradictions in the civil law system. The complementary special civil law has the characteristics of multi-mode, self-sufficiency, stratification and the richness of the effectiveness of the model law. The richness of supplementary special civil law cannot override the status of civil code as the basic law of civil society. At the same time, the system of supplementary special civil law should be restricted by the stratification attribute and the effect of model law induced by the richness of its legal source. Therefore, to sort out and investigate the richness and systematicness of maritime law not only has the value of "supplement white" in a certain sense, but also has more realistic significance. The systematic appeal of supplementary special civil law provides a new perspective and approach for the amendment of China Sea Commercial Code and the influence of Rotterdam rules.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学;
【基金】：辽宁省社会科学基金规划项目(L12BFX005) 中国海洋发展研究会重大项目(CAMAZDA201501)
【分类号】：D922.294

【相似文献】