既存债务追加物保的破产撤销问题

发布时间：2018-04-28 02:58

  本文选题：追加物保 + 破产撤销权　； 参考：《法学》2015年10期

【摘要】：对我国《企业破产法》第31条所规定的追加物保撤销权,在理解和适用时不应局限于法条的字面意思,而应基于其立法目的予以实质把握。实务中出现的诸如通过"借新还旧"对既存债务予以清偿并同时对新债务设立物保,债务人以自有财产向原本没有反担保的担保人提供反担保,双方当事人在设立最高额抵押权时将既存债务一并纳入担保范围,以及登记生效类担保物权在破产临界期起算后迟延进行登记或进行本登记等复杂情形,均有通过"判断债权人的受偿地位是否在临界期内因追加物保得到提升"予以实质审查的必要。此外,对于采登记对抗主义的担保物权,若在破产临界期起算时仍未登记,破产程序中也不应承认其优先地位。
[Abstract]:When we understand and apply the right of rescission of supplementary property insurance stipulated in Article 31 of Enterprise bankruptcy Law of our country, it should not be limited to the literal meaning of the article, but should be grasped substantively on the basis of its legislative purpose. In practice, such as the repayment of existing debts through "new repayment" and the creation of a real estate guarantee for new debts, the debtor provides counterguarantees with its own property to the guarantor, who originally did not have a counter-guarantee, When the parties establish the maximum amount of mortgage, they bring the existing obligation into the scope of the security, and the complicated circumstances such as the delay in registration or the registration of the security interest of the type of security interest that is effective in registration after the calculation of the critical period of bankruptcy, etc., There is a need for substantive examination through "judging whether the creditor's compensation status is promoted in the critical period because of the additional protection". In addition, if the security interest of registration antagonism is not registered at the time of the bankruptcy critical period, it should not be recognized as a priority in the insolvency proceedings.
【作者单位】： 浙江京衡律师事务所;
【分类号】：D922.291.92

【参考文献】

中国期刊全文数据库 前10条

1 杨立新;宋志红;;预告登记的性质、效力和范围探索[J];法学杂志;2006年04期

2 张淑隽;潘v炗，

本文编号：1813469