浅议招标文件歧视性条款

发布时间：2018-04-30 11:30

本文选题：招标投标活动 + 招标文件　；参考：《山东社会科学》2015年S1期

【摘要】：招标投标作为一种具有竞争性的经济活动,现已成为烟草行业货物、工程、服务采购的主要形式和实现一般公正的重要手段。随着招标范围和规模正在逐步扩大,国家烟草专卖局提出"应招尽招、真招实招"的工作要求。招标文件的歧视性条款已成为影响烟草行业"真招实招"的突出问题之一。早在2000年出台的《招标投标法》就明确规定"招标人不得以不合理的条件限制或者排斥潜在投标人,不得对潜在投标人实行歧视待遇",但直至2011年颁布的《招标投标法实施条例》才以法条形式列举了歧视性条款的六种具体类型。文章通过案例分析,引出歧视性条款的定义、危害,并进一步分析了歧视性条款的五种表现形式,并有针对性地提出了防范对策,以期能为烟草行业招标采购工作健康良性发展提供一些启发和帮助。
[Abstract]:As a competitive economic activity, bidding has become the main form of procurement of goods, engineering and services in tobacco industry and an important means to achieve general justice. With the scope and scale of bidding gradually expanding, the State Tobacco Monopoly Bureau put forward the work request of "recruit all the students, and really recruit the real ones". The discriminatory provisions of bidding documents have become one of the outstanding problems affecting tobacco industry. As early as 2000, the Law on bidding and bidding clearly stipulated that "the tenderer shall not restrict or exclude potential bidders under unreasonable conditions," "No discriminatory treatment may be applied to potential bidders", but it was not until the implementation regulations of the bidding Law promulgated in 2011 that the six specific types of discriminatory provisions were listed in the form of articles. Through the case analysis, the paper draws out the definition and harm of the discriminatory clause, and further analyzes the five manifestations of the discriminatory clause, and puts forward the preventive countermeasures. In order to provide some inspiration and help for the healthy development of bidding and purchasing in tobacco industry.
【作者单位】：济南市烟草专卖局(公司);
【分类号】：D922.297

【相似文献】