行业协会限制竞争行为的法律规制

发布时间：2018-05-01 21:10

本文选题：行业协会 + 限制竞争　；参考：《河南师范大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：伴随着我国市场经济的发展和完善，行业协会在我国也经历了从无到有，再到逐步完善的发展历程。我们也逐渐认识到行业协会是把双刃剑，它不仅具有促进市场竞争的能力，也具有限制市场竞争的威胁。我国对行业协会限制竞争行为的研究起步较晚，导致我国法律对此的规制也比较薄弱，《反垄断法》中只是粗略的提到了行业协会，并没有对其进行详细的规范。在行业协会地位日益凸显的今天，为了适应经济全球化的趋势，我们必须完善对行业协会的法律规制，规范行业协会行为，以加快我国市场经济健康发展的步伐。本文以“论行业协会限制竞争行为的法律规制”为题，运用实证研究和比较研究等方法，对行业协会限制竞争行为问题进行了初步探讨，并提出了一些建议。本文分为五个部分：第一部分主要介绍了行业协会的相关概念，包括行业协会的定义，以及非营利性、非政府性和中间性等特征，同时也简单介绍了行业协会对市场竞争的作用，包括对市场竞争的促进作用和限制作用。第二部分是行业协会限制竞争行为的概念和特征以及表现形式。行业协会限制竞争行为的表现形式主要是固定价格、信息交换、标准化认证和集体抵制等形式，这些形式都表现了行业协会限制竞争行为的主体特殊性、行为隐蔽性、后果严重性的特点。第三部分从我国的实际出发，介绍了我国行业协会限制竞争行为的特点，以及我国法律对其规制的现状和其中存在的问题。由于我国目前存在行业协会具有一定的“二政府”性，因此它在实施限制竞争行为时往往会有一些行政力量的参与。目前我国并没有规专门制行业协会的法律，现有的法律在对行业协会进行规制时也存在有一定问题，如对行业协会没有做出明确界定，行业协会的法律责任设定也不完善等。第四部分主要通过对国外行业协会限制竞争行为法律规制的介绍，可以使我们从中借鉴一些经验。首先介绍了国际上认定行业协会限制竞争行为违法的原则，然后介绍了美国、德国、日本等国家对行业协会限制竞争行为的法律规制模式，最后从行政、民事、刑事三方面介绍了其他国家在法律责任上的设定。第五部分对完善我国行业协会限制竞争行为的法律规制提出了几点建议。从总体上来看，我们可以制定专门的《行业协会法》，以便对行业协会进行全面规制；也可以制定反垄断法的实施细则或指南，在其中对行业协会的限制竞争行为作出明确的规定。无论是采用哪种方式，我们都必须要明确界定行业协会的范畴，完善其三大责任体系。
[Abstract]:With the development and perfection of China's market economy, trade associations have also experienced a process of development from scratch to gradual improvement. We have come to realize that trade association is a double-edged sword, which not only has the ability to promote market competition, but also has the threat of restricting market competition. The research of restricting competition behavior of trade association in our country started late, which led to the weak regulation of the trade association in our country. The Anti-monopoly Law only roughly mentioned the trade association, and did not regulate it in detail. In order to adapt to the trend of economic globalization, we must perfect the legal regulation and regulate the behavior of trade associations in order to speed up the healthy development of market economy in our country. Based on the topic of "on the legal Regulation of Trade Association's restrictive competitive behavior", this paper makes a preliminary discussion on the issue of Trade Association's restrictive competitive behavior by means of empirical research and comparative study, and puts forward some suggestions. This paper is divided into five parts: The first part mainly introduces the related concepts of trade associations, including the definition of trade associations, as well as the non-profit, non-governmental and intermediate characteristics, and also briefly introduces the role of trade associations in market competition. Including the promotion of market competition and the role of restrictions. The second part is the concept, characteristics and manifestation of restrictive competition behavior of trade association. The main forms of restrictive competition behavior of trade association are fixed price, information exchange, standardized authentication and collective boycott. These forms all show the particularity of the main body of the trade association restricting competition behavior, the behavior is hidden. The seriousness of the consequences. The third part introduces the characteristics of the restrictive competition behavior of China's trade associations, the current situation of our country's legal regulation and the existing problems from the point of view of the reality of our country. Due to the existence of trade associations in our country, there are two governments, so it often involves some administrative forces in the process of restricting competition. At present, our country does not have the law of specialized trade association, the existing law also has certain problems in regulating the trade association, for example, there is no clear definition of the trade association, and the legal responsibility of the trade association is not perfect, and so on. The fourth part mainly through the introduction of the foreign trade association restriction competition behavior legal regulation, may enable us to draw lessons from some experience. First of all, it introduces the principles of international recognition of the illegality of restrictive competition behavior of trade associations, and then introduces the legal regulation models of trade associations restricting competition behavior in the United States, Germany, Japan and other countries, finally, from the administrative, civil, civil, etc. Three aspects of criminal law introduced the legal liability of other countries. In the fifth part, some suggestions are put forward to perfect the legal regulation of restrictive competition behavior of China's trade associations. In general, we can formulate a special Trade Association Act to regulate trade associations in a comprehensive way, and we can also formulate detailed rules or guidelines for the implementation of the anti-monopoly law. In which the trade association to limit competition behavior made clear provisions. In either way, we must clearly define the scope of trade associations and perfect their three responsibility systems.
【学位授予单位】：河南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D922.294

【参考文献】

中国期刊全文数据库前10条

1 侯雪梅;;反垄断法视野中的行业协会[J];北方论丛;2008年04期

2 郑鹏程;美国反垄断法“本身违法”与“合理法则”适用范围探讨[J];河北法学;2005年10期

3 义海忠;郑艳馨;;对我国行业协会性质错位的思考[J];河北法学;2008年03期

4 高娟;;行业协会在区域合作中的作用及其立法完善——基于环渤海区域合作的考察[J];经济论坛;2009年03期

5 梁上上;论行业协会的反竞争行为[J];法学研究;1998年04期

6 徐楠;杨辉;;行业协会限制竞争行为法律责任制度研究[J];学理论;2010年02期

7 《社会主义市场经济体制下的行业管理》课题组;市场经济发达国家的行业组织和政府的行业管理[J];国家行政学院学报;2002年06期

8 石宏英;日本行业协会对企业的信息情报功能与经济功能[J];日本问题研究;2000年01期

9 鲁篱;周道树;;论我国行业协会集体抵制行为的反垄断法规制[J];天府新论;2008年03期

10 杨辉;刘世宽;;大型零售商限制竞争行为的法律规制[J];行政与法;2008年02期