我国公司社会责任的司法适用研究

发布时间：2018-05-04 00:26

本文选题：道德责任 + 司法适用　；参考：《昆明理工大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：传统理论认为,公司是以盈利为目的的企业法人,只为了追求利润最大化,不应该承担社会责任,社会责任由社会单方面承担。现代社会中公司的影响力越来越重要。于是,企业承担相应的社会责任对和谐社会有着重大作用被许多国家认同。按照没有无义务的权利理论即要享受权利必须承担相应的义务,公司也要承担社会责任。20世纪初,“公司社会责任”最先被美国提出,引起了巨大讨论。我国开始关注公司社会责任时间上晚于西方国家并且理论薄弱,很多问题没有达成共识,司法实践非常少。需要顺应国际形势将公司社会责任纳入司法实践保障公司社会责任的实施,由司法力量来确保公司社会责任的实现。文章以公司社会责任司法化的基本理论展开研究,理论是基础,只有理论的支持才能有司法实践。由于国外研究公司社会责任比较早,有丰富的实践经验和案例。我国有很多可以借鉴的。所以从国内外学者对公司社会责任内涵的界定、性质、研究着手分析,提出公司社会责任司法适用的论题。我们虽然在很多公司社会责任研究上没有达成相同意见。但是我国公司社会责任司法化已经有了法律依据,这也说明我国是承认公司社会责任的。法律条文表明我国公司社会责任是司法适用的条件。接着分析我国公司部分逃避社会责任,使得公共利益受到损害,公司社会责任司法适用的实际情况不容客观,分析原因,找出缺陷。在强化我国公司社会责任司法适用的必要性,再次说明司法适用是法律得以落实的最有力的保障。最后通过立法方面、法解释学、司法审查、完善公益诉讼、比较美国公司社会责任案例制度,建立我国特色的案例指导制度等方式强化我国公司社会任司法适用。
[Abstract]:The traditional theory holds that the company is an enterprise legal person whose aim is to make profit, only to pursue the profit maximization, should not undertake the social responsibility, the social responsibility is assumed by the society unilaterally. The influence of companies is becoming more and more important in modern society. Therefore, the enterprise undertakes the corresponding social responsibility has the important function to the harmonious society by many countries. According to the theory of right without obligation, to enjoy the right must bear the corresponding obligation, and the company must also bear the social responsibility. At the beginning of the 20th century, "corporate social responsibility" was first put forward by the United States, which caused a great deal of discussion. China began to pay attention to corporate social responsibility later than western countries and weak theory, many issues have not reached consensus, judicial practice is very little. It is necessary to incorporate corporate social responsibility into judicial practice to ensure the implementation of corporate social responsibility, and to ensure the realization of corporate social responsibility by judicial force. This paper studies on the basic theory of corporate social responsibility judicature, theory is the foundation, only the support of theory can have judicial practice. Because foreign research company social responsibility is early, has the rich practice experience and the case. Our country has a lot to learn from. Therefore, from the domestic and foreign scholars on the definition of corporate social responsibility, nature, research and analysis, put forward the topic of corporate social responsibility judicial application. Although we do not agree on many corporate social responsibility studies. However, there is a legal basis for the judicalization of CSR in our country, which indicates that CSR is recognized in our country. The legal provisions show that corporate social responsibility is the condition of judicial application. Then, the author analyzes that some companies in our country avoid social responsibility, which damages the public interest, and the actual situation of the judicial application of corporate social responsibility is not objective, analyzes the reasons and finds out the defects. In strengthening the necessity of the judicial application of corporate social responsibility in our country, it is proved once again that the judicial application is the most effective guarantee for the implementation of the law. Finally, through legislation, legal hermeneutics, judicial review, improve public interest litigation, compare the case system of corporate social responsibility in the United States, and establish a case guidance system with Chinese characteristics, strengthen the judicial application of corporate social responsibility in China.
【学位授予单位】：昆明理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【参考文献】