网络不正当竞争行为法律规制研究

发布时间：2018-05-04 06:51

本文选题：互联网 + 不正当竞争　；参考：《安徽财经大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：互联网领域的不正当竞争是现实世界传统市场竞争在网络领域的延伸,由于互联网自身所具有的特点和性质,例如数字化、匿名性、虚拟性和外放性等,网络领域的不正当竞争表现出不同于现实世界传统市场不正当竞争的特有的表现形式和特点。由于互联网的普及和大众对互联网的依赖性日益提高,互联网领域的不正当竞争给普通消费者带来的侵害和社会主义市场经济秩序的冲击越来越明显。为了保障社会主义市场经济和互联网领域经济秩序的平稳发展和持续繁荣,我们国家很有必要加强对互联网领域不正当竞争的法律规制。互联网在中国的发展历史不是很长,所以相对来说我国对于互联网领域商业规制的经验不是很丰富,可以适用的规制相关行为的法律规范也不是很完善。市场经济国家的“经济宪法”和“自由企业宪章”——反不正当竞争法是规范市场经济国家的市场经济秩序的不可或缺的基础性法律。而我国的《反不正当竞争法》是在以规范传统的市场经济秩序为背景的条件下制定颁布的,其对于现代市场经济不正当竞争的新的表现形式,即互联网领域内的不正当竞争的规范暴露出来一定的弊端,调整范围有限,亟需进行一定的完善。此外,我国与《反不正当竞争法》相配套的规范制度也不是很健全,因此健全相关的配套制度,对于完善我国现代市场经济秩序也起到很重要的作用。本文大致分为四个部分,第一部分对网络不正当竞争行为的概念进行界定,给出了网络不正当竞争行为的一般构成要件,并归纳其特征主要包括虚拟性、匿名性、广域性、独立性、共享性、交互性、即时性、平等性等;第二部分对我国网络不正当竞争行为的规制现状进行分析并提出其存在的问题:我国《反不正当竞争法》主要存在规定过于原则性、规制主体存在限制等问题;其他对网络不正当竞争行为进行规范的法律文件中也存在一些问题,如对商标法的适用不充分、立法存在一定的滞后性等;第三部分主要介绍国外主要国家和国际层面对不正当竞争行为的规制以及我国可以借鉴的经验,主要包括西方主要国家对于不正当竞争行为的规制,如德国《反不正当竞争法》、日本《不正当竞争防止法》等。另外,还介绍了国际层面对不正当竞争行为的规制,如《欧盟商标指令》、《保护工业产权巴黎公约》等;最后一部分提出解决方案,一方面从立法、行政等方面对我国网络不正当竞争行为的规制进行补充,另一方面针对域名范围不正当竞争行为和恶意软件领域内的不正当竞争行为的特殊性给出相应的完善对策。
[Abstract]:The unfair competition in the field of the Internet is the extension of the traditional market competition in the real world. Because of the characteristics and properties of the Internet itself, such as digitalization, anonymity, virtuality and extroversion, etc. The unfair competition in the network field is different from the traditional market in the real world. Due to the popularity of the Internet and the increasing dependence of the public on the Internet, the unfair competition in the field of the Internet has brought more and more obvious damage to the ordinary consumers and the impact of the socialist market economic order. In order to ensure the smooth development and sustainable prosperity of the socialist market economy and the economic order in the field of Internet, it is necessary for our country to strengthen the legal regulation of unfair competition in the field of Internet. The history of Internet development in China is not very long, so the experience of commercial regulation in the field of Internet in China is not very rich, and the applicable legal norms of regulating related behavior are not very perfect. "Economic Constitution" and "Charter of Free Enterprise" of Market economy countries-Anti-unfair Competition Law is an indispensable basic law to regulate the order of market economy in market economy countries. The Anti-unfair Competition Law of our country was formulated and promulgated under the background of standardizing the traditional market economic order, which is a new manifestation of unfair competition in the modern market economy. The regulation of unfair competition in the field of Internet exposed some drawbacks, limited range of adjustment, and needed to be improved. In addition, our country and "Anti-unfair Competition Law" matching standard system is not very sound, so the perfect supporting system, to improve our modern market economic order also plays a very important role. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part defines the concept of network unfair competition behavior, gives the general elements of network unfair competition behavior, and summarizes its characteristics, including virtual, anonymous, wide area. Independence, sharing, interactivity, immediacy, equality, etc. The second part analyzes the current situation of the regulation of network unfair competition in our country and puts forward the existing problems: the main provisions of Anti-unfair Competition Law in China are too principled and the regulation subject is limited. There are also some problems in other legal documents that regulate the unfair competition behavior of the network, such as the inadequate application of trademark law, the existence of lag in legislation and so on; The third part mainly introduces the foreign countries and the international level of the regulation of unfair competition behavior and China can learn from the experience, including the main western countries on the regulation of unfair competition behavior. For example, Germany, anti-unfair competition law, Japan, unfair competition prevention law, and so on. In addition, it also introduces the international regulation of unfair competition, such as the EU Trademark Directive, the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial property, and so on. On the other hand, the author puts forward the corresponding perfect countermeasures in view of the particularity of the domain name scope unfair competition behavior and the malware field unfair competition behavior in our country network unfair competition behavior regulation, and so on, carries on the supplement to our country network unfair competition behavior, on the other hand, proposes the corresponding consummation countermeasure.
【学位授予单位】：安徽财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D922.294

【参考文献】