标准必要专利的反垄断法规制——兼与欧美实践经验对话

发布时间：2018-05-04 16:08

本文选题：信息产业标准必要专利 + 反垄断　；参考：《知识产权》2015年12期

【摘要】：近年来有关信息产业标准必要专利的反垄断案件在全球范围内风起云涌,各国反垄断执法司法机构亦就如何消除标准实施过程中可能产生的反竞争效果进行了有益探索。通过梳理华为诉美国IDC滥用标准必要专利垄断案,微软收购诺基亚经营者集中审查以及国家发改委对高通公司的反垄断调查,并与欧美有关实践经验进行比较,可以初步总结出我国有权机关在此类案件中界定相关市场、认定市场支配地位的考查要点与论证进路。信息产业标准必要专利反垄断法规制的中国逻辑符合世界逻辑之精华,又立足具体案情作出宝贵创新,反过来有利于世界逻辑之完善。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the antitrust cases related to the necessary patents in the information industry standards are surging in the global scope, and the judicial organs of the anti-monopoly law enforcement in various countries have also carried on the beneficial exploration on how to eliminate the anti-competitive effect that may be produced in the course of the implementation of the standards. By combing the case of Huawei v. the United States IDC regarding the abuse of the necessary patent monopoly of standards, Microsoft's acquisition of Nokia operators centralized review and the National Development and Reform Commission's antitrust investigation into Qualcomm, and compared with the relevant practical experience in Europe and the United States, We can preliminarily summarize the main points of examination and argumentation path of determining the dominant position of the market by defining the relevant market in this kind of cases by the competent organs in our country. The Chinese logic regulated by the patent antimonopoly law in the information industry standard accords with the essence of the world logic, and makes valuable innovations based on the concrete cases, which is beneficial to the perfection of the world logic.
【作者单位】：厦门大学法学院;厦门大学知识产权研究院;
【基金】：2015年国家社会科学基金重点项目“中国产业发展视域下的FRAND解释问题研究”(项目编号:15AFX018)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D922.294

【相似文献】