劳动债权受偿优先性的经济法解读——从经济法之分配正义观谈起

发布时间：2018-05-10 22:09

本文选题：劳动债权 + 担保物权　；参考：《学术交流》2015年10期

【摘要】：《破产法》规定了担保物权的优先性,体现了民法对个人本位、形式平等以及效率优先的追求:它将劳动债权未能同金融债权一样获得担保的原因归结为"合同自由";它浸透了对银行等金融机构个体利益的呵护,却低估了群体问题可能引致的社会动荡;它甚至无视劳动债权中包含的生存利益而执守着"物权优先效力"的路径依赖——担保物权优先于劳动债权的结论让人质疑。经济法的分配正义观以社会利益、实质平等以及公平效率兼顾为内容,它正视而不是忽视劳动者的弱势缔约身份;重视而不是漠视破产财产分配对社会整体利益的影响;珍视而不是藐视作为社会道德基础的生存利益。因此,以经济法分配正义观为逻辑起点,基于对民法的功能矫正,我们进行了对劳动债权优先受偿的合理性解读。
[Abstract]:The bankruptcy Law stipulates the priority of the security right, and embodies the civil law as the individual standard. The pursuit of formal equality and efficiency priority: it ascribes the reason that labor claims are not guaranteed as financial claims to "freedom of contract"; it immerses itself in the care of individual interests of financial institutions such as banks, But it underestimates the possible social unrest caused by the group problem; it even ignores the survival interests contained in the labor creditor's rights and holds the path dependence of "property priority effect"-the conclusion that the security right takes precedence over the labor creditor's rights is questionable. The view of distribution justice of economic law takes social interests, substantive equality and fair and efficient consideration as its content. It faces and does not ignore the weak contracting status of laborers, attaches importance to the distribution of bankruptcy property, and ignores the influence of the distribution of bankruptcy property on the overall interests of the society. Cherish, not despise, the survival interests that are the basis of social morality. Therefore, taking the view of distributive justice in economic law as the logical starting point and based on the functional correction of civil law, we interpret the rationality of the priority of labor creditor's rights.
【作者单位】：东北林业大学文法学院;
【基金】：黑龙江省哲学社会科学研究规划项目(13D002) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(DL13BC11)
【分类号】：D922.291.92

【参考文献】