论纵向垄断协议的规制

发布时间：2018-05-21 07:12

本文选题：垄断协议 + 纵向垄断协议　；参考：《山东大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着社会经济的快速发展,交易形式的多元化,纵向垄断行为也越来越多发。存在认定难、举证难、执法人员专业素质不高、处罚力度不够等问题。本文从实践角度出发,对上述几个问题进行了论述。纵向垄断协议法律明确规定的有两种类型,对此法条做了列举式的规定。本文第一部分首先介绍了纵向垄断协议的概念、特点和它的类型。法律规定的类型有固定向第三人转售商品的价格、限定向第三人转售商品的最低价格。理论界根据这两种特定的类型,又把纵向垄断协议具体分为三种。本文在讲述纵向垄断协议的类型时,又对纵向垄断协议的认定做了简单的介绍。之后就说明了纵向垄断协议对经济社会的双重影响。表明消极影响,是为了说明现阶段对纵向垄断协议规制的必要性和迫切性。对于一个问题的解决,我们要实事求是的了解他的现状,就像解决一个案件要了解它的案件事实一样,所以本文论述了纵向垄断协议现阶段的事实问题,即现状。通过对现状的分析,我们就可以发现现阶段纵向垄断协议在实践中存在的问题很多,首先是源头上的问题,即立法层面的问题。其次是在司法实践中存在的主要问题,即对证据的收集和认定,还有证明责任的分配。要想对纵向垄断协议进行规制,就先要认定这是一个纵向垄断协议,这是需要大量证据来证明的,但我国现阶段在认定纵向垄断协议方面,有关证据的规定还比较少,内容单一不完善。我国在纵向垄断协议方面的法律规定较少,但国外对此有许多值得我们学习和借鉴的比较有成效的规定,本文主要罗列了几个典型的国家,比如美国、德国等经济发达国家,通过对国外有关规定的了解,我们可以根据我国的实际情况,借鉴国外的规定,制定出比较适合我们国家的规制方式。本文第四部分就针对本文前面提到的问题,对症下药的提出了完善的建议,完善措施是一种自上而下的完善,首先从源头上解决立法问题,接下来就是司法方面的完善了。只有完善这些不足之后,才能有效的规制纵向垄断协议。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of social economy, the diversification of transaction forms, vertical monopoly behavior is more and more. There are difficult to identify, difficult to prove, the professional quality of law enforcement personnel is not high, punishment is not strong enough and so on. This paper discusses the above problems from the point of view of practice. There are two types of vertical monopoly agreements, which are listed. The first part of this paper introduces the concept, characteristics and types of vertical monopoly agreement. The types prescribed by law include fixed price for resale to third party and minimum price for resale to third party. According to these two specific types, the theoretical circle divides the vertical monopoly agreement into three types. When describing the types of vertical monopoly agreements, this paper briefly introduces the determination of vertical monopoly agreements. After that, it explains the dual influence of vertical monopoly agreement on economy and society. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the necessity and urgency of regulating vertical monopoly agreements. For the solution of a problem, we should seek truth from facts to understand his current situation, just as to solve a case to know its case facts, so this paper discusses the vertical monopoly agreement at the present stage of the factual problem, that is, the status quo. Through the analysis of the present situation, we can find that there are many problems in the practice of the vertical monopoly agreement at the present stage, the first is the problem of the source, that is, the problem of the legislative level. The second is the main problems in judicial practice, that is, the collection and identification of evidence, and the distribution of burden of proof. In order to regulate the vertical monopoly agreement, we must first assume that it is a vertical monopoly agreement, which needs a lot of evidence to prove. However, at the present stage in our country, there are relatively few evidential provisions for the determination of the vertical monopoly agreement. The content is not perfect. There are few legal provisions on vertical monopoly agreements in our country, but there are many more effective provisions in foreign countries which are worthy of our study and reference. This article mainly lists several typical countries, such as the United States, Germany, and other economically developed countries. Through the understanding of the relevant regulations of foreign countries, we can draw on the rules of foreign countries according to the actual situation of our country, and work out a more suitable regulation mode for our country. The fourth part of this article in view of the problems mentioned in this article, to the case of the proposed improvement of the proposal, perfect measures is a top-down improvement, first from the source to solve the legislative problems, and then the judicial aspects of the perfect. Only when these deficiencies are perfected, can the vertical monopoly agreement be regulated effectively.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D922.294

【参考文献】