我国无主股权僵局中无主股权的归属问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-29 18:01

本文选题：“无主股权” + 《公司法》　；参考：《江西财经大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：公司股东作为公司的所有人,就是公司的主人,对公司具有绝对的拥有权与控制权,股权就是这种身份与权力的集中表达,并表现为一种综合性的权利,是公司股东人身权与财产权的有机结合体。但是在公司的法律事务中,可能由于公司股东主体资格的消失,导致公司主人的消失,无论何种原因导致的公司主人的消失,都会影响到公司的正常运营,也会产生一系列不必要的麻烦,导致公司经营出现各种问题,也会给债权人造成较大的经济损失,因此对于无主股权的探讨具有着十分重要的现实意义。实践中由于公司股东消失(死亡、失踪、失联、被宣告死亡等),但是股东股权又无继承或者遗赠的的“股权”被称为“无主股权”。“无主股权”会在多方面影响公司的效益,对公司产生或多或少的影响,如果“无主股权”所占公司股份较大则会直接导致公司僵局的产生。现行的立法中对于这种“无主股权”的处理尚无较为合适的措施,对于“无主股权”的研究也仅仅在各位学者的论著之中,但是对于“无主股权”的处理也没有全面的处理措施。本文将结合“无主股权”的形成与特点,对“无主股权”存在的利弊进行深入的分析,并探究“无主股权”在公司僵局中存在的现实形态与其影响作用。通过基础分析与研究,最终对无主股权的归属问题进行梳理,探明依照现行法律如何解决“无主股权”。并在综合分析的基础上,提出笔者对于“无主股权”处理的模式选择。本文第一章概述了“无主股权”的相关基础理论,主要包括了“无主股权”的含义,“无主股权”的特征,“无主股权”产生的原因,“无主股权”的存在的合理性,“无主股权”的危害性,“无主股权”归属的观点,从“无主股权”的诞生到“无主股权”的各种性质和处理观点都进行了十分深入的探究;本文第二章,深入的探讨了“无主股权”在处理过程中存在的各种问题,通过列举案例的形式,本文列举了两个案例,并对其进行了深入的实证分析,分析结束后更是对于“无主股权”法律中存在的不足与实践中存在的不足进行了分析;本文第三章主要陈述了笔者对于“无主股权”僵局处理的个人观点,分别从法律规定完善角度、“无主股权”解决模式与路径角度对“无主股权”的解决进行了分析研究,笔者观点可能存在一定青涩,但是也较全面的概述了“无主股权”的具体法律执行模式,同时也思考了相关的立法原则与社会主义市场价值;本文接着就对全文进行了概述总结,并表达了自己的观点。
[Abstract]:As the owner of the company, the shareholders of the company have absolute ownership and control over the company. Equity is the concentrated expression of this identity and power, and it is shown as a comprehensive right. It is an organic combination of personal rights and property rights of shareholders. However, in the legal affairs of a company, the disappearance of the main body qualification of the shareholders of the company may lead to the disappearance of the owner of the company. Whatever the reason, the disappearance of the owner of the company will affect the normal operation of the company. It will also produce a series of unnecessary troubles, which will lead to a variety of problems in the management of the company, and will also cause a large economic loss to the creditors. Therefore, it is of great practical significance to discuss the ownership without ownership. In practice, due to the disappearance of shareholders (death, disappearance, loss, declaration of death, etc.), but shareholders' equity without inheritance or bequeath "equity" is called "ownership without ownership". "No ownership" will affect the efficiency of the company in many ways and have a more or less impact on the company. If the "ownership without ownership" shares in the company is larger, it will directly lead to the deadlock of the company. In the current legislation, there is no proper measure to deal with this kind of "ownership without ownership", and the study of "ownership without owner" is only in the works of scholars. However, there are no comprehensive measures to deal with the non-ownership right. Combined with the formation and characteristics of "ownership without owner", this paper makes an in-depth analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of the existence of "ownership without ownership", and probes into the realistic form and influence of "ownership without ownership" in the deadlock of the company. Through the basic analysis and research, the author combs the ownership of ownership, and explores how to solve the problem of ownership according to the current law. On the basis of the comprehensive analysis, the author puts forward the choice of the mode of dealing with the non-principal equity. The first chapter summarizes the relevant basic theories of "ownership without owner", including the meaning of "ownership without owner", the characteristics of "ownership without owner", the reasons for the emergence of "ownership without owner", the rationality of the existence of "ownership without ownership". The harmfulness of "ownership without owner", the view of ownership of "ownership without ownership", from the birth of "ownership without ownership" to the nature and treatment of "ownership without owner" are deeply explored. This paper probes into the various problems existing in the process of dealing with "ownership without ownership", and through enumerating the form of cases, this paper enumerates two cases, and makes an in-depth empirical analysis of them. At the end of the analysis, the author analyzes the deficiency in the law of "ownership without owner" and the deficiency in practice. The third chapter mainly states the author's personal views on the deadlock of "ownership without ownership". From the angle of perfection of law and regulation, this paper analyzes and studies the solution of "ownership without owner" from the angle of solution mode and path. But it also gives a comprehensive overview of the specific law enforcement mode of "ownership without ownership", and also considers the relevant legislative principles and socialist market value. Then, this paper summarizes the full text and expresses its own views.
【学位授予单位】：江西财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【参考文献】