当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 经济法论文 >

论税收救济制度中“纳税前置”规则的废除

发布时间:2018-06-28 04:38

  本文选题:税收救济 + 纳税前置 ; 参考:《首都经济贸易大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:在我国税收救济制度中,关于纳税争议问题的解决途径实行“双重前置”规则,即纳税前置于复议,复议前置于诉讼。纳税前置作为“双重前置”规则之一,其目的是为了防止国家税收的流失,但该规则在客观上阻碍了纳税人救济权的行使,给本身就单一的税收争议解决途径又增设了一道资格准入的门槛,限制了纳税人的救济权,导致了不纳税无救济的情形发生。这一规则自设立时起就广受学界和实务界诟病,有权利必有救济是保障法律实施、保护权利实现的题中之义,面对税收争议,在本应向纳税人敞开救济大门的情况下却增设了一把枷锁,把无力缴纳税款的纳税人拒之救济大门外,使得国家财政税收的过分保护与对纳税人权利的限缩形成鲜明对比。现如今,财税体制改革越来越注重对纳税人权利的保护,纳税前置规则明显与财税体制改革的发展方向相左。本文将对纳税前置规则做以简介,以实际运行中出现的问题来对该规则进行检讨,通过借鉴域外税收救济制度的经验,找出我国税收救济理念存在的问题,最后从税法的发展方向、价值取向、税收救济应遵循的理念要求出发,结合实践提出废除纳税前置规则的建议,以完善我国的税收救济制度,期望能够实现税收的法治化,对公权力进行规范和制约,保护纳税人的财产权,促进社会的公平正义,实现税法从“管理”向“治理”的转变,推进我国财税法治建设,为财税法的发展起到积极促进作用。
[Abstract]:In the tax relief system of our country, the way to solve the tax dispute is to carry out the "double preposition" rule, that is, to put the tax before the reconsideration and the reconsideration to the lawsuit. As one of the "double front" rules, the purpose of tax preposition is to prevent the loss of national tax revenue, but this rule objectively hinders the exercise of taxpayer's right of relief. It adds a threshold of qualification to the single tax dispute settlement, limits the taxpayer's right of relief, and leads to the situation of not paying taxes without relief. Since its establishment, this rule has been widely criticized by the academic and practical circles. The right to have a remedy is to guarantee the implementation of the law and the realization of the protection of the right, and to face tax disputes. Under the circumstances that should have opened the door of relief to the taxpayer, a new shackle was added, excluding the taxpayer who could not pay the tax, which made the excessive protection of the national finance and tax and the restriction of the taxpayer's right to form a sharp contrast. Nowadays, the reform of fiscal and taxation system pays more and more attention to the protection of taxpayers' rights. This article will make a brief introduction to the tax preposition rule, review the rule with the problems that appear in the actual operation, and find out the problems existing in the idea of tax relief in our country by drawing lessons from the experience of the extraterritorial tax relief system. Finally, starting from the developing direction of tax law, the orientation of value and the requirement of the idea that tax relief should follow, and combining with practice, this paper puts forward some suggestions to abolish the tax preposition rule, in order to perfect the tax relief system of our country, and expect to realize the rule of law of tax revenue. To regulate and restrict the public power, to protect the property rights of taxpayers, to promote social fairness and justice, to realize the transformation of tax law from "management" to "governance", to promote the construction of fiscal and taxation rule of law in our country, and to play an active role in promoting the development of fiscal and taxation law.
【学位授予单位】:首都经济贸易大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D922.22

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 杨登峰;;从合理原则走向统一的比例原则[J];中国法学;2016年03期

2 付大学;;比例原则视角下税务诉讼“双重前置”之审视[J];政治与法律;2016年01期

3 刘剑文;侯卓;;纳税前置制度的反思与超越[J];江汉论坛;2015年06期

4 刘剑文;;理财治国视阈下财税改革的法治路径[J];现代法学;2015年03期

5 张守文;;税制变迁与税收法治现代化[J];中国社会科学;2015年02期

6 刘奇超;;我国新一轮税收征管改革的制约、重点与实现路径——以国外税收征管发展新趋势为借鉴[J];经济体制改革;2015年01期

7 胡玉鸿;;“失败者正义”原则与弱者权益保护[J];中国法学;2014年05期

8 朱大旗;胡明;;正当程序理念下我国《税收征收管理法》的修改[J];中国人民大学学报;2014年05期

9 刘剑文;;论财税体制改革的正当性——公共财产法语境下的治理逻辑[J];清华法学;2014年05期

10 刘剑文;;论国家治理的财税法基石[J];中国高校社会科学;2014年03期

相关重要报纸文章 前3条

1 翟继光;;研读马哲 观照税改[N];中国税务报;2016年

2 施正文;;落实法定原则 完善税收制度[N];中国税务报;2013年

3 靳东升;;国外税收征管模式发展呈现七大趋势[N];中国税务报;2012年

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 陈劲松;我国税务行政复议前置程序的批判与重构[D];中南大学;2014年



本文编号:2076765

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2076765.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户2ec6d***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com