船舶融资租赁中采用光租登记的法律风险研究

发布时间：2018-07-05 17:20

本文选题：船舶融资租赁 + 光船租赁登记　；参考：《华东政法大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：船舶融资租赁不仅具有融资租赁的一般特征,即集融资融物于一体,加之船舶本身的特殊性,因此更为复杂。实践中,船舶融资租赁虽有独立的合同,但为了公示的需要,承租双方必须再签订一份光租合同,并按光船租赁关系办理登记手续。1虽然二者存在很多共性,在现阶段没有船舶融资租赁登记制度的情况下,为了明示船舶权利,使第三人了解船舶的基本情况,保证交易安全,可以采用光租登记,但由于两种租赁存在着本质上的差异,以其为基础的登记制度也存在着不同的对抗效力,如果一味地照搬适用光租登记,将影响船舶融资租赁行业未来的发展,并在实践中产生相应的法律风险。2因此,如何加快完善我国船舶融资租赁相关制度,作为解决实践需要和健全我国相关法律制度的长效机制,应当成为我国当前法学研究的一个重要课题。但是目前国内对于这个问题的研究,主要集中在讨论如何建立船舶融资租赁登记制度,以替代光租登记上,3对于在船舶融资租赁中采用光租登记会面临怎样的风险、产生风险的根源在哪并没有过多的论述。没有对于理论的深入分析如何提出最恰当的解决办法。另外,建立船舶融资租赁登记制度固然重要,但在这种制度确立之前,如何在现有条件下,通过合理安排合同条款,完善登记制度等办法,来满足船舶融资租赁行业的发展需求,同样值得深入研究和探讨。所以本文拟从司法实践中的真实案例入手,分析采用光租登记会面临的风险、产生风险的根源,以及在现阶段下如何维护船舶融资租赁的健康发展。
[Abstract]:The ship finance lease not only has the general characteristic of the finance lease, that is, the financing finance material in one body, but also the particularity of the ship itself, so it is more complex. In practice, although there is an independent contract for ship financing lease, for the sake of publicity, both parties must sign a bare charter contract again, and register according to the bareboat charter relationship although there are many similarities between the two parties. Under the condition that there is no ship finance lease registration system at present, in order to express the ship right, make the third party understand the basic condition of the ship and guarantee the transaction safety, we can use the bare charter registration, but because of the essential difference between the two kinds of lease, The registration system based on it also has different antagonistic effects. If we blindly copy the application of light charter registration, it will affect the future development of ship finance charter industry and produce corresponding legal risks in practice. 2. How to speed up the improvement of the ship financing lease system, as a long-term mechanism to solve the practical needs and improve the relevant legal system, should be an important subject in the current legal research of our country. However, the current domestic research on this issue is mainly focused on how to establish the ship finance lease registration system to replace the light lease registration. What kind of risks will be faced with the use of bare lease registration in ship finance lease? The source of the risk is not much discussed. No in-depth analysis of the theory of how to put forward the most appropriate solution. In addition, it is important to establish a registration system for ship financing leases, but before the establishment of this system, how to improve the registration system through reasonable arrangement of contract terms under existing conditions, To meet the development needs of ship financing leasing industry, it is also worth in-depth study and discussion. Therefore, this paper intends to start with the real cases in judicial practice, and analyze the risks, the root causes of the risks, and how to maintain the healthy development of ship financing lease in the present stage.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D922.294

【相似文献】