分享经济视角下网约车政府规制问题研究

发布时间：2018-07-25 16:40

【摘要】：网约车是"互联网+"的产物,是一种有别于"经典市场交易"和"科层式企业"的新经济业态。网约车服务通过对闲置资源的社会化再利用,实现了车辆的"去专用化",使用而非占有的资源配置方式更易实现,在提高资源使用率、构建差异化服务体系、推进交通出行领域供给侧改革等方面发挥了积极作用,是分享经济在全球范围的一次生动实践。《网络预约出租汽车经营服务管理暂行办法》套用旧有出租车规制模式,以"类比规制"的方式对网约车实施监管,制约了分享经济的发展。从法律上看,传统出租车行业与新兴网约车行业的利益之争本质上是既得权与发展权的冲突,政府对出租车的行政许可并不意味其可以免于网约车的竞争,对网约车设置相对宽松的准入门槛和规制模式,并不构成对出租车平等保护权的侵犯,创新网约车政府规制模式具有现实依据和法律正当性。
[Abstract]:Ride-sharing is the product of "Internet", which is a new economic form different from "classic market transaction" and "branch type enterprise". Through the socialized reuse of idle resources, the network ride-sharing service realizes the "despecialization" of vehicles, which is easier to realize by using rather than occupying the resources, and improves the utilization rate of resources and constructs a differentiated service system. It has played an active role in promoting supply-side reform in the field of transportation travel, which is a vivid practice of sharing economy on a global scale. The development of sharing economy is restricted by the regulation of ride-sharing by analogy regulation. From the legal point of view, the conflict of interests between the traditional taxi industry and the emerging online car-sharing industry is essentially a conflict between the vested right and the right to development. The government's administrative license for taxis does not mean that it can be exempted from the competition of ride-sharing. The establishment of a relatively loose entry threshold and regulatory model for the net-ride-hailing does not constitute an infringement of the equal protection rights of taxis. The innovation of the net-ride-sharing government regulation mode has realistic basis and legal legitimacy.
【作者单位】：郑州大学;浙江警察学院;
【分类号】：D922.296

【参考文献】