我国行政性垄断的公平竞争审查规制研究
发布时间：2018-07-29 19:51
【摘要】：《反垄断法》和《行政诉讼法》对于我国行政垄断的规制效果有限,迫切需要公平竞争审查规制的有力补充。但是,由于我国的公平竞争审查制度才刚刚起步,具体实施机制尚未成熟,存在"自我审查"为主难以保证审查效果,激励机制缺失难保责任主体主动性以及审查标准、程序概括化导致可操作性较低的问题。因此,有必要建立以"自我审查"为辅的审查机制,确立政策制定机关的激励、惩戒机制,同时细化公平竞争审查的具体标准、程序,从而对我国的公平竞争审查机制进行优化,进而更加全面、高效地规制行政垄断行为。
[Abstract]:Anti-monopoly Law and Administrative Litigation Law have limited effect on the regulation of administrative monopoly in our country, so it is urgent to supplement the regulation of fair competition review. However, due to the fact that the fair competition examination system in our country has just started, the concrete implementation mechanism is not mature, it is difficult to guarantee the effect of the review by "self-examination", and the incentive mechanism lacks the initiative of the subject of responsibility and the standard of review. The generalization of the procedure leads to the problem of low maneuverability. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a review mechanism supplemented by "self-censorship", to establish incentives and disciplinary mechanisms for policy-making organs, and to refine the specific standards and procedures of fair competition review. In order to optimize our fair competition review mechanism, and then more comprehensive and efficient regulation of administrative monopoly behavior.
【作者单位】： 西南政法大学经济法学院;
【基金】：2015年国家社科基金“互联网新型不正当竞争行为法律规制的实证研究”,项目编号:15BFX125 西南政法大学经济法学科“两江学者”团队2016年度团队研究课题“公平竞争审查制度的地方性实施机制及效果评估研究” 2017年重庆市研究生科研创新项目“公平竞争审查标准的实证研究——以各省市的公平竞争审查实施意见为样本”,项目编号:CYB17084
【分类号】：D922.294
本文编号：2153805
[Abstract]:Anti-monopoly Law and Administrative Litigation Law have limited effect on the regulation of administrative monopoly in our country, so it is urgent to supplement the regulation of fair competition review. However, due to the fact that the fair competition examination system in our country has just started, the concrete implementation mechanism is not mature, it is difficult to guarantee the effect of the review by "self-examination", and the incentive mechanism lacks the initiative of the subject of responsibility and the standard of review. The generalization of the procedure leads to the problem of low maneuverability. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a review mechanism supplemented by "self-censorship", to establish incentives and disciplinary mechanisms for policy-making organs, and to refine the specific standards and procedures of fair competition review. In order to optimize our fair competition review mechanism, and then more comprehensive and efficient regulation of administrative monopoly behavior.
【作者单位】： 西南政法大学经济法学院;
【基金】：2015年国家社科基金“互联网新型不正当竞争行为法律规制的实证研究”,项目编号:15BFX125 西南政法大学经济法学科“两江学者”团队2016年度团队研究课题“公平竞争审查制度的地方性实施机制及效果评估研究” 2017年重庆市研究生科研创新项目“公平竞争审查标准的实证研究——以各省市的公平竞争审查实施意见为样本”,项目编号:CYB17084
【分类号】：D922.294
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 白桦;;浅析石油垄断立法的重要性[J];商场现代化;2010年08期
2 蔡勇;中国呼唤反垄断法[J];经济师;2002年07期
3 向国雍;;我国《反垄断法》的不足之处[J];决策与信息(财经观察);2008年06期
4 李亘;;我国反行政垄断必要性分析——以对比“西方反垄断制度”为视角[J];现代妇女(下旬);2014年03期
5 葛冉;;浅议反垄断法与社会主义市场经济[J];现代商业;2008年18期
6 尹德洪;;反垄断法的法律经济学分析——兼评《中华人民共和国反垄断法》[J];贵州财经学院学报;2008年06期
7 邢芝凡;王月明;;行政垄断的行政法规制问题探究[J];企业经济;2014年07期
8 黄河,徐德敏,李永宁;论社会主义市场经济条件下的行政干预与行政垄断——兼论反垄断法对行政垄断的豁免[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2002年06期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 王萍;梁振林;;渔业与《反垄断法》关系的研究[A];2007年中国水产学会学术年会暨水产微生态调控技术论坛论文摘要汇编[C];2007年
，本文编号：2153805
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2153805.html
