当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 经济法论文 >

商业秘密司法认定研究

发布时间:2018-08-05 17:51
【摘要】:商业秘密因具有的巨大商业价值而与企业的生存、发展紧密关联,而这也导致其被侵犯的现象时有发生。作为商业秘密侵权认定的前置性条件——商业秘密的认定,在司法实践中主要围绕其秘密性、保密性、价值性三大要件展开。通过对12年间上海审结的72件关于商业秘密纠纷案件的梳理、研究,发现一个普遍性问题:法院对这些要件的认定很多时候并不妥当,有些要件的认定甚至被忽略。对此,还需从各要件背后的理论对存在的问题进行分析,并以此为基础解决商业秘密认定中出现的一般性问题。首先,秘密性作为基础性要件,不管诉争信息形式上是否公知,均应当满足其可区别于普通信息的部分未被公开、同行业竞争者难以获得。其次,对于保密性,保密措施本身的有效存在是前提,特殊情形下对其认定还应考虑被告的特殊身份;保密范围是权利人保密意志的体现,它应明确包含涉案秘密点;保密措施须合理有效,落实到商业秘密保护的各环节并使保密义务人能够知悉保密对象;对保密性的认定应坚持主客观相一致原则。最后,价值性是商业秘密能得到法律保护的原因;对其认定应综合考虑权利人对信息付出的是形成该信息的劳动,且该信息具有应用的可能性,对其拥有与使用带来的价值较同类信息有最起码的优势。
[Abstract]:Because of its great commercial value, trade secret is closely related to the survival and development of the enterprise, which leads to the phenomenon that it is violated from time to time. As the pre-condition of the trade secret infringement, the commercial secret is mainly defined around its secrecy, confidentiality and value in the judicial practice. By combing 72 cases of trade secret disputes concluded in Shanghai in the past 12 years, the author finds a general problem: the court's determination of these elements is often inappropriate, and some elements are even ignored. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the existing problems from the theory behind the various elements, and to solve the general problems in the identification of trade secrets on the basis of this. First of all, secrecy as a basic element, regardless of whether the form of information is known or not, should be satisfied that the part of information that can be distinguished from ordinary information is not disclosed, and it is difficult for competitors in the same industry to obtain it. Secondly, for confidentiality, the effective existence of confidentiality measures itself is the premise, the special identity of the defendant should be considered in the special circumstances, the scope of confidentiality is the embodiment of the will of the obligee to keep secret, and it should include the secret points involved in the case. The secrecy measures should be reasonable and effective, be carried out in all aspects of the protection of trade secrets and enable the confidentiality obligor to know the object of secrecy, and the principle of consistency between subject and objective should be adhered to in the determination of confidentiality. Finally, the value is the reason why the trade secret can be protected by law, and it should be considered synthetically that what the obligee pays to the information is the labor that forms the information, and the information has the possibility of application. The value of its possession and use has a minimum advantage over that of the same kind of information.
【学位授予单位】:安徽师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D922.294

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 顾韬;;关于侵害技术秘密纠纷案件审理思路及方法的探讨[J];电子知识产权;2015年12期

2 沈玉忠;;客户名单商业秘密法律属性之界定[J];中国检察官;2015年22期

3 邓恒;;商业秘密司法鉴定之实践检讨[J];知识产权;2015年05期

4 周宁;卢恒飞;;侵犯商业秘密罪的司法认定——以50份刑事判决书为基础的分析[J];福建法学;2014年03期

5 张玲玲;张传磊;;经营类信息构成商业秘密的司法认定 以未出版书稿的商业秘密保护为视角[J];电子知识产权;2014年08期

6 史仲凯;;客户名单商业秘密侵权纠纷审理中的有关问题——以权益平衡为视角[J];知识产权;2014年04期

7 陈爱华;;日本关于侵犯商业秘密行为的认定[J];知识产权;2013年07期

8 付国涛;;企业商业秘密保护对策[J];企业改革与管理;2013年05期

9 张素英;;破解商业秘密范围确认难题[J];保密工作;2013年04期

10 鲍陆文英;;客户名单作为商业秘密的保护的认定——以美国法为视角[J];华北科技学院学报;2012年02期

相关硕士学位论文 前3条

1 吴振国;客户名单商业秘密侵权纠纷疑难法律问题研究[D];华东政法大学;2013年

2 缪龙江;论我国商业秘密的认定标准及其完善[D];湖南大学;2010年

3 郑雅雯;中英商业秘密保护法律制度比较研究[D];暨南大学;2009年



本文编号:2166538

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2166538.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户e4908***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com