自发到自觉:我国市场信息不对称法律规制体系研究
发布时间：2018-08-16 07:55
【摘要】：信息不对称会导致市场失灵,引起逆向选择和道德风险,这种问题市场是有效市场的隐患,市场自身不能解决,需要公共机构的强制介入,而一般的公共机构缺乏权威,因此需要政府的法律规制。依据科斯定理和法经济学的理论,当交易费用大于零时产权的分配及调整相比交易本身调整能够带来更大社会福利。因此,市场信息不对称法律规制的关键所在是信息披露义务的分配及违反该义务的救济。当前我国市场信息不对称法律规制存在众多问题,尚未形成体系。如:缺少信息不对称法律规制原则、规则体系;法律规制的方法体系中缺少第三方工具、激励工具,工具的设置也缺少经济学和法学理论依据;对于市场信息不对称法律规制核心内容总结不足等。完善其基本思路:遵循信息持有人负披露商品信息义务的原则、制定违反信息披露义务单独惩戒规则及举证责任倒置规则,形成信息不对称法律规制的原则和规则体系;依据一般法理,概括市场信息不对称法律规制体系的核心内容,包含:市场信息披露权利和义务的确定,不披露信息行为的定性及分类;信息不对称行为的法律责任;完善第三方和社会公益组织信息披露工具,依成本—效益理论设置惩罚工具,常态化激励工具,合理设置组合工具,形成信息不对称法律规制的方法体系。
[Abstract]:Information asymmetry will lead to market failure, adverse selection and moral hazard. This problem is a hidden danger of effective market. The market itself can not be solved. It needs the mandatory intervention of public institutions, while the general public institutions lack authority. Therefore, it needs the legal regulation of the government. The distribution and adjustment of property rights can bring more social welfare than the adjustment of transaction itself when the property rights are greater than zero. Therefore, the key to the legal regulation of market information asymmetry lies in the distribution of information disclosure obligation and the relief for breach of this obligation. Lack of third-party tools, incentive tools, lack of economic and legal theoretical basis in the legal system of legal regulation; lack of summary of the core content of the legal regulation of market information asymmetry. According to the principle of interest obligation, we should formulate the separate punishment rule and the inversion rule of burden of proof for violating the obligation of information disclosure, and form the principle and rule system of the legal regulation of information asymmetry. Qualitative and classification of behavior; legal liability of information asymmetry behavior; perfecting information disclosure tools of third parties and social public welfare organizations; setting up punishment tools according to cost-benefit theory; normalizing incentive tools; setting up reasonable combination tools; forming a legal system of information asymmetry regulation.
【作者单位】： 山东女子学院社会与法学院;山东女子学院知识产权研究中心;山东大学经济学院;山东大学信用研究中心;
【基金】：山东省人文社会科学项目(15-JS-YB-11)
【分类号】：D922.294
本文编号：2185379
[Abstract]:Information asymmetry will lead to market failure, adverse selection and moral hazard. This problem is a hidden danger of effective market. The market itself can not be solved. It needs the mandatory intervention of public institutions, while the general public institutions lack authority. Therefore, it needs the legal regulation of the government. The distribution and adjustment of property rights can bring more social welfare than the adjustment of transaction itself when the property rights are greater than zero. Therefore, the key to the legal regulation of market information asymmetry lies in the distribution of information disclosure obligation and the relief for breach of this obligation. Lack of third-party tools, incentive tools, lack of economic and legal theoretical basis in the legal system of legal regulation; lack of summary of the core content of the legal regulation of market information asymmetry. According to the principle of interest obligation, we should formulate the separate punishment rule and the inversion rule of burden of proof for violating the obligation of information disclosure, and form the principle and rule system of the legal regulation of information asymmetry. Qualitative and classification of behavior; legal liability of information asymmetry behavior; perfecting information disclosure tools of third parties and social public welfare organizations; setting up punishment tools according to cost-benefit theory; normalizing incentive tools; setting up reasonable combination tools; forming a legal system of information asymmetry regulation.
【作者单位】： 山东女子学院社会与法学院;山东女子学院知识产权研究中心;山东大学经济学院;山东大学信用研究中心;
【基金】：山东省人文社会科学项目(15-JS-YB-11)
【分类号】：D922.294
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 闫婷婷;;从证券立法角度谈信息不对称问题[J];当代经理人;2006年11期
2 张学文;陈燕凤;;金融服务者之说明义务[J];福建金融管理干部学院学报;2014年01期
3 王开田,娄权;会计信息管制的经济学分析——兼评《会计法》的作用[J];四川会计;2000年11期
4 杨勇;;旅游购物欺诈及其成因分析[J];教育教学论坛;2013年39期
5 龙稳全,李国献;“有奖发票”的法律经济分析[J];广东商学院学报;2005年05期
6 张丽娜;;以民商法与经济法的视角看信息不对称的法律规制[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2014年11期
7 刘恺;孙蕊;;银行个人理财中的法律低效应用及其解决路径[J];法制与经济(下旬);2013年03期
8 许敏;刘珂;;对QFII制度下证券信息不对称问题的法律思考[J];法制与社会;2009年10期
9 邓进;;论商业贿赂及其管制[J];山西财政税务专科学校学报;2007年02期
10 宋怡欣;;按揭贷款信息不对称性的比较法研究[J];消费经济;2014年03期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 应飞虎;信息失灵的制度克服研究[D];西南政法大学;2002年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 田雨灵;消费信息不对称法律规制研究[D];安徽财经大学;2015年
2 耿磊;消费信息不对称的法律规制研究[D];河北经贸大学;2012年
，本文编号：2185379
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2185379.html
