供给侧改革视野下行政垄断规制路径新探

发布时间：2018-09-14 07:08

【摘要】：我国有着权力干预经济的悠久历史传统,在这一肥沃的土壤上,行政垄断现象层出不穷,对公平竞争市场造成了严重的损害。尽管行政垄断早已纳入《反垄断法》的规制,但是其治理效果不尽人意,面临着巨大的制度困境。我国在行政垄断治理路径的选择上采取了行政体制内部进行纠正的路径,在“规则之治”异化的情形之下,此路径难以承担治理行政垄断的重任。在供给侧改革的时代背景下,破除行政垄断俨然是势在必行,同时行政垄断也迎来了有史以来最佳的规制环境,但是却面临着巨大的制度障碍。如何抓住行政垄断治理的新契机,构建普遍适用的规制路径体系,从而突围行政垄断治理的困境,是本文要解决的核心问题。第一章,透视供给侧改革反思我国行政垄断规制的必要性。不同于西方国家所倡导的供给管理,在我国特殊语境下供给侧改革有其独特的内涵,其实质在于强调政府在有效供给形成和结构优化方面的积极作用,或者可以进一步说本轮经济改革是对政府以往干预市场行为的修正,核心在于处理好政府与市场之间的关系。在这基本内涵的指引下,行政垄断的治理便成为供给侧改革中的重要内容,透视供给侧改革反思我国行政垄断规制也就具有显著的现实意义。简而言之,不管是基于现实角度或理论逻辑角度去考量,破除行政垄断在全面推进供给侧改革中占据着重要地位。第二章,供给侧改革视野下我国规制行政垄断的制度困境。立足于我国目前行政垄规制现状来看,其治理效果是不尽人意的。首先政府在行政垄断治理中存在严重的角色越位。传统权贵经济文化与“官本位”思想使得我国长期以来缺乏竞争文化,再加上政府多重角色的混同,让政府常常脱离本位。其次竞争合规审查在行政垄断治理中存在缺位。当下我国正如火如荼地展开公平竞争审查制度的建设,但是从《意见》的出台到制度的落实,还需要当局更大的决心与毅力。最后我国《反垄断法》在规制行政垄断上存在错位。规制范围的局限、规制责任的无力以及竞争执法的弱化使得《反垄断法》在规制行政垄断上显得力不从心,难以承担反行政垄断之重任。第三章,供给侧改革视野下行政垄断规制路径的选择。在供给侧改革视野下突围行政垄断治理的困境,最为核心的便是要寻求一条合理的规制路径。在现行法律规制框架下我国行政垄断规制路径是一条依赖行政体制内部进行纠正的封闭式路径,缺乏系统性的全面联动规制路径体系。借鉴转轨经济国家和发达国家关于行政垄断治理路径选择的实践经验,我国行政垄断规制路径的选择应当立足于本土资源,借着供给侧改革的新契机,寻求全面联动的规制路径。第四章,供给侧改革视野下行政垄断规制的路径展开与制度创新。从理念出发深入到行政垄断治理的各个环节,本文构建了由规制基础路径——规制前置路径——规制事前路径——规制事后路径组成的全面联动型规制路径体系。在供给侧改革的视野下,进一步探求各个路径的展开逻辑。规制基础路径——政府与市场之角色重塑是行政垄断治理的旗帜,明确了治理路径的方向与定位。规制前置路径——公平竞争审查之落实为破除行政垄断打前站,将行政垄断现象扼杀在摇篮中。规制事前路径——实体立法之完善是行政垄断治理的中心环节,是将行政垄断治理纳入法治轨道的基础。规制事后路径——竞争执法之常态化是行政垄断治理的事后救济机制,是最后一道市场竞争的保护屏障。
[Abstract]:China has a long historical tradition of power intervention in the economy. In this fertile soil, administrative monopoly emerges one after another, causing serious damage to the fair competition market. In the context of the supply-side reform, it is imperative to break the administrative monopoly, and at the same time, the administrative monopoly has ushered in the best regulation ever. How to seize the new opportunity of administrative monopoly governance and build a generally applicable regulatory path system to break through the predicament of administrative monopoly governance is the core problem to be solved in this paper. The supply-side reform advocated by the government has its unique connotation in the special context of our country. Its essence lies in emphasizing the positive role of the government in the formation of effective supply and the optimization of the structure. Or it can be further said that this round of economic reform is a revision of the government's past intervention in the market, and the core is to handle the government and the market well. Under the guidance of this basic connotation, the governance of administrative monopoly has become an important part of the supply-side reform. It is of great practical significance to reflect on the regulation of administrative monopoly through the supply-side reform. In the second chapter, the institutional dilemma of regulation of administrative monopoly under the perspective of supply-side reform is discussed. Based on the present situation of administrative ridge regulation in China, the governance effect is unsatisfactory. Firstly, the government has a serious role offside in the administration of administrative monopoly. The idea of "position" has made our country lack of competitive culture for a long time, coupled with the confusion of multiple roles of the government, so that the government often breaks away from the standard. Finally, there is a dislocation in the regulation of administrative monopoly in China's Anti-monopoly Law. The limitation of regulation scope, the inability of regulation responsibility and the weakening of competition enforcement make the Anti-monopoly Law seem unable to regulate administrative monopoly and bear the heavy responsibility of anti-administrative monopoly. The most important thing is to find a reasonable regulation path under the perspective of supply-side reform. Under the current legal framework, the regulation path of administrative monopoly in China is a closed path which relies on the internal correction of the administrative system and lacks systematicness. Referring to the practical experience of the transition economy countries and developed countries on the choice of administrative monopoly governance path, the choice of administrative monopoly regulation path in China should be based on local resources, taking advantage of the new opportunity of supply-side reform, to seek a comprehensive linkage regulation path. Chapter IV, from the perspective of supply-side reform. From the concept to the various links of administrative monopoly governance, this paper constructs a comprehensive linkage regulation path system consisting of the basic regulation path-the pre-regulation path-the pre-regulation path-the pre-regulation path-the pre-regulation path-the Post-regulation path. The basic path of regulation - the role remodeling of government and market is the banner of administrative monopoly governance, and the orientation and orientation of the governance path are clarified. The perfection of substantive legislation is the central link of administrative monopoly governance and the basis of bringing administrative monopoly governance into the orbit of rule of law.
【学位授予单位】：中南财经政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.294

【参考文献】