市场诚信与消费者保护制度的国际比较研究
发布时间：2018-10-20 16:49
【摘要】：本文的研究的主要目的在于通过问卷调查比较不同国家的市场诚信水平,以及通过计量实证来分析消费者保护制度对市场诚信是否存在促进作用,来对我国的市场诚信建设提出建议。研究发现,发达国家的市场诚信水平平均要明显高于发展中国家。发达国家中瑞典和新西兰最高,加拿大、美国、德国和日本其次,而俄罗斯、英国、法国、西班牙和韩国最低;发展中国家中,欧洲发展中国家的平均市场诚信水平最高,非洲发展中国家和亚洲发展中国家基本持平。相对于总体来说,我国的市场诚信水处于比较低的水平,这说明我国的诚信缺失比较严重,亟需改善。通过实证分析,无理由退货制度、惩罚性赔偿制度和消费者教育制度对市场诚信起到了显著的正向作用,而无理由退货制度对市场诚信的影响最大。因此,笔者建议我国完善无理由退货制度,惩罚性赔偿制度和消费者教育制度,提高消费者弱势地位,降低经营者短期机会主义行为动机,促进合同执行力,从而提高市场诚信水平。除此之外,提高市场经济完善程度,产权保护、教育水平和人均收入来促进经济发展和经济福利。
[Abstract]:The main purpose of this paper is to compare the level of market integrity in different countries by questionnaire, and to analyze whether consumer protection system can promote market integrity through econometric evidence. In order to our country's market integrity construction puts forward the proposal. The study found that the average level of market integrity in developed countries is significantly higher than that in developing countries. Among the developed countries, Sweden and New Zealand are the highest, Canada, the United States, Germany and Japan are second, while Russia, the United Kingdom, France, Spain and South Korea are the lowest. Among the developing countries, the developing countries in Europe have the highest average level of market integrity. Developing countries in Africa and developing countries in Asia are basically the same. Compared with the general situation, the market integrity water in our country is at a relatively low level, which indicates that the lack of honesty in our country is serious and needs to be improved. Through the empirical analysis, the unjustified return system, punitive damages system and consumer education system have played a significant positive role in market integrity, while the unjustified return system has the greatest impact on market integrity. Therefore, the author suggests that our country should perfect the unjustified return system, punitive damages system and consumer education system, improve the weak position of consumers, reduce the motivation of short-term opportunistic behavior of managers, and promote the execution of contracts. In order to improve the integrity of the market level. In addition, improve the market economy, property rights protection, education and per capita income to promote economic development and economic welfare.
【学位授予单位】：华中科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.8;F203
本文编号：2283771
[Abstract]:The main purpose of this paper is to compare the level of market integrity in different countries by questionnaire, and to analyze whether consumer protection system can promote market integrity through econometric evidence. In order to our country's market integrity construction puts forward the proposal. The study found that the average level of market integrity in developed countries is significantly higher than that in developing countries. Among the developed countries, Sweden and New Zealand are the highest, Canada, the United States, Germany and Japan are second, while Russia, the United Kingdom, France, Spain and South Korea are the lowest. Among the developing countries, the developing countries in Europe have the highest average level of market integrity. Developing countries in Africa and developing countries in Asia are basically the same. Compared with the general situation, the market integrity water in our country is at a relatively low level, which indicates that the lack of honesty in our country is serious and needs to be improved. Through the empirical analysis, the unjustified return system, punitive damages system and consumer education system have played a significant positive role in market integrity, while the unjustified return system has the greatest impact on market integrity. Therefore, the author suggests that our country should perfect the unjustified return system, punitive damages system and consumer education system, improve the weak position of consumers, reduce the motivation of short-term opportunistic behavior of managers, and promote the execution of contracts. In order to improve the integrity of the market level. In addition, improve the market economy, property rights protection, education and per capita income to promote economic development and economic welfare.
【学位授予单位】：华中科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.8;F203
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 廖丽;;中国消费者权利保护现状研究——以联合国《保护消费者准则》为基准[J];宏观质量研究;2013年01期
2 文建东;;诚信、信任与经济学:国内外研究评述[J];福建论坛(人文社会科学版);2007年10期
3 谢海;;中国消费者保护制度缺陷的经济学分析[J];经济体制改革;2006年06期
4 廖小平;;论诚信与制度[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2006年06期
5 刘益灯;中国消费者保护的立法缺陷及其完善[J];湖南大学学报(社会科学版);2003年01期
6 张维迎,柯荣住;信任及其解释:来自中国的跨省调查分析[J];经济研究;2002年10期
7 杨瑞龙;关于诚信的制度经济学思考[J];中国人民大学学报;2002年05期
8 张维迎,柯荣住;诉讼过程中的逆向选择及其解释——以契约纠纷的基层法院判决书为例的经验研究[J];中国社会科学;2002年02期
9 张维迎;法律制度的信誉基础[J];经济研究;2002年01期
，本文编号：2283771
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2283771.html
