我国反垄断私人诉讼激励法律机制研究
发布时间：2018-10-21 11:55
【摘要】：自从2008年我国反垄断法颁布以来,反垄断执法机构查处了一部分垄断违法案件,但是垄断行为在我国的境内,却屡禁不止。在私人诉讼方面,虽然已经存在许多私人主体走进法院进行诉讼的情形,但是仍然存在胜诉率过低,原告方举证困难等情况。究其原因,这与我国相关法律制度不健全,反垄断公共实施与反垄断私人诉讼缺少相应的互动机制不无关系。为此,最高人民法院于2012年5月颁布了《最高人民法院关于审理因垄断行为引发的民事纠纷案件应用法律若干问题的规定》,这也意味着我国在未来的一段时间内将进一步完善反垄断法的实施机制。以此为契机,笔者认为反垄断法私人诉讼激励法律机制是一个良好的切入点,通过借鉴域外法律经验,讨论各种制度的优劣,力图在我国建立完善的反垄断法私人诉讼制度。这其中的核心是我们应当关注普通公民参与私人诉讼中的积极性,在实体或者程序上做出适当的改良,激励普通公民走进法院,进行反垄断诉讼。完善反垄断私人诉讼制度,首先在应当重视法律的激励功能,使得普通公民更加愿意走进法院,运用反垄断私人诉讼这来维护自己的合法权益;其次,要对举证责任进行合理分配或者设计相关的帮助制度,使得走进法院的普通公民,对待垄断企业这一庞然大物的时候,在诉讼中不丧失对抗的能力;最后,在我国确立反垄断私人禁令诉讼,使得胜诉个人的合法权益得到有效的救济和保障。
[Abstract]:Since the promulgation of the Anti-monopoly Law in 2008, anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies have investigated and dealt with some illegal monopoly cases. In the aspect of private litigation, although there have been many cases of private subjects entering the court for litigation, there are still cases such as the low rate of success and the difficulty of proving evidence by the plaintiff. The reason is that our country's relevant legal system is not perfect, the antitrust public implementation and the antimonopoly private lawsuit lack the corresponding interactive mechanism. To that end, In May 2012, the Supreme people's Court promulgated the provisions of the Supreme people's Court on the Application of Law in handling cases of Civil disputes caused by Monopoly, which also means that China will move forward in the future. Steps to improve the implementation mechanism of the anti-monopoly law. Taking this as an opportunity, the author thinks that the private litigation incentive legal mechanism of anti-monopoly law is a good starting point. Through reference to the extraterritorial legal experience, the author discusses the merits and demerits of various systems, and tries to establish a perfect private litigation system of anti-monopoly law in China. The core of this is that we should pay attention to the enthusiasm of ordinary citizens to participate in private litigation, make appropriate improvement in entity or procedure, and encourage ordinary citizens to enter the court and carry out antitrust litigation. To improve the system of private antitrust litigation, we should first attach importance to the incentive function of the law so that ordinary citizens are more willing to enter the court and use private antitrust litigation to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests; secondly, The burden of proof should be reasonably distributed or the relevant help system should be designed so that ordinary citizens who enter the court will not lose their ability to fight in the proceedings when they treat the monopoly as a giant; finally, The establishment of anti-monopoly private injunction in our country makes the legal rights and interests of successful individuals effective relief and protection.
【学位授予单位】：沈阳师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.294
[Abstract]:Since the promulgation of the Anti-monopoly Law in 2008, anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies have investigated and dealt with some illegal monopoly cases. In the aspect of private litigation, although there have been many cases of private subjects entering the court for litigation, there are still cases such as the low rate of success and the difficulty of proving evidence by the plaintiff. The reason is that our country's relevant legal system is not perfect, the antitrust public implementation and the antimonopoly private lawsuit lack the corresponding interactive mechanism. To that end, In May 2012, the Supreme people's Court promulgated the provisions of the Supreme people's Court on the Application of Law in handling cases of Civil disputes caused by Monopoly, which also means that China will move forward in the future. Steps to improve the implementation mechanism of the anti-monopoly law. Taking this as an opportunity, the author thinks that the private litigation incentive legal mechanism of anti-monopoly law is a good starting point. Through reference to the extraterritorial legal experience, the author discusses the merits and demerits of various systems, and tries to establish a perfect private litigation system of anti-monopoly law in China. The core of this is that we should pay attention to the enthusiasm of ordinary citizens to participate in private litigation, make appropriate improvement in entity or procedure, and encourage ordinary citizens to enter the court and carry out antitrust litigation. To improve the system of private antitrust litigation, we should first attach importance to the incentive function of the law so that ordinary citizens are more willing to enter the court and use private antitrust litigation to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests; secondly, The burden of proof should be reasonably distributed or the relevant help system should be designed so that ordinary citizens who enter the court will not lose their ability to fight in the proceedings when they treat the monopoly as a giant; finally, The establishment of anti-monopoly private injunction in our country makes the legal rights and interests of successful individuals effective relief and protection.
【学位授予单位】：沈阳师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.294
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 丁国峰;;反垄断法私人实施的法理基础和具体路径[J];华北电力大学学报(社会科学版);2011年02期
2 王先林;;论反垄断民事诉讼与行政执法的衔接与协调[J];江西财经大学学报;2010年03期
3 李剑;;反垄断法中核心设施的界定标准——相关市场的视角[J];现代法学;2009年03期
4 王健;;反垄断法私人执行的优越性及其实现——兼论中国反垄断法引入私人执行制度的必要性和立法建议[J];法律科学(西北政法学院学报);2007年04期
5 刘桂清;;反垄断法实施中的几个重大关系析[J];政法论丛;2007年03期
6 郑鹏程;;美国反垄断法三倍损害赔偿制度研究[J];环球法律评论;2006年02期
7 王健;;威慑理念下的反垄断法刑事制裁制度——兼评《中华人民共和国反垄断法(修改稿)》的相关规定[J];法商研究;2006年01期
8 柳学信;;网络产业接入定价与互联互通管制——对我国电信业互联互通问题的分析[J];中国软科学;2004年02期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 万宗瓒;反垄断私人诉讼制度研究[D];西南政法大学;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 张力;反垄断法私人实施制度研究[D];兰州大学;2013年
2 胡晓颐;反垄断法民事责任制度研究[D];山西大学;2012年
3 王Z，
本文编号：2285018
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2285018.html
