上市公司股权敌意收购的法律问题研究

发布时间：2018-10-24 18:29

【摘要】：引起社会各界广泛热议的“万科股权争夺战”再次使敌意收购成为热门话题。宝能系通过对万科的数次举牌成为其最大股东,万科的管理层以宝能集团信用不够为由对其表示不欢迎。同时宝能集团声称遵守法律,相信市场力量。一边是市场法则,一边是万科的价值坚守,一场合法的股权收购所引发的广泛争议使我们不得不反思其背后的法律制度所存在的问题。敌意收购的快速发展对现行法律制度提出了更高的需求,而当前相关的立法存在诸多不足,正是基于此,笔者以“敌意收购的法律问题”为选题进行研究。本文共分为四个部分:第一章是上市公司股权敌意收购的界定及其法律属性定位。本章首先通过对敌意收购的概念进行界定。其次对敌意收购产生的条件及特点进行论述。最后通过对敌意收购的价值及其缺陷进行分析,总结出敌意收购的法律属性。第二章是敌意收购对我国现行法律制度的挑战。本章首先通过敌意收购在我国的发展及衍变情况进行论述。接着提出敌意收购在我国的发展困境。最后总结出敌意收购的发展对我国现行法律制度所带来的一系列问题。第三章是域外敌意收购的衍变及其法律规制。该章首先对域外敌意收购的发展及衍变进行研究。其次提出域外敌意收购衍变的困境及其法律应对。最后通过对域外和我国敌意收购法律规制的情况进行比较,总结出域外敌意收购的法律规制对我国立法的启示。第四章是我国敌意收购法律制度体系的完善。该章首先对我国敌意收购的立法态度进行探讨。其次总结出敌意收购制度立法的原则。最后针对我国敌意收购制度立法不足的现状提出个人的建议。
[Abstract]:Vanke's share-right battle, which has aroused widespread debate from all walks of life, has once again made hostile takeover a hot topic. Baoneng became its largest shareholder through several signings to Vanke, whose management dismissed Baoneng Group's lack of credit as a reason. At the same time, Baoneng Group claims to abide by the law, believe in market forces. One side is the market law, the other is the value of Vanke, a legal equity acquisition caused by the widespread controversy, we have to reflect on its legal system behind the problems. The rapid development of hostile takeover puts forward a higher demand for the current legal system, but there are many shortcomings in the current relevant legislation. Based on this, the author studies the topic of "the legal problem of hostile takeover". This paper is divided into four parts: the first chapter is the definition of hostile takeover of listed companies and its legal attributes. This chapter firstly defines the concept of hostile takeover. Secondly, it discusses the conditions and characteristics of hostile takeover. Finally, by analyzing the value and defects of hostile takeover, the legal attributes of hostile takeover are summarized. The second chapter is the challenge of hostile takeover to China's current legal system. This chapter firstly discusses the development and evolution of hostile takeover in China. Then put forward hostile takeover in China's development dilemma. Finally, a series of problems brought by the development of hostile takeover to the current legal system of our country are summarized. The third chapter is the evolution of hostile takeover and its legal regulation. This chapter firstly studies the development and evolution of hostile takeover. Secondly, it puts forward the dilemma of the development of hostile takeover and its legal response. Finally, by comparing the legal regulation of hostile takeover between foreign countries and China, the author summarizes the enlightenment of the legal regulation of extraterritorial hostile takeover to the legislation of our country. The fourth chapter is the perfection of the legal system of hostile takeover in China. This chapter first discusses the legislative attitude of hostile takeover in China. Secondly, it summarizes the principle of hostile takeover system legislation. Finally, the author puts forward some personal suggestions on the insufficient legislation of hostile takeover system in China.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.287

【相似文献】