当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 经济法论文 >

我国类别股制度建立之构思

发布时间:2018-11-08 16:05
【摘要】:类别股制度是依据权利内容的不同而将股份进行类别化并辅之以特殊保护的一整套制度设计的集合,该制度已被公司法律制度成熟的国家或地区广泛运用,如美国、英国、德国、日本、中国台湾等。本文通过比较分析商事发达国家在类别股制度建设中的立法实践,结合我国的现实国情、法律体系和实践习惯,对我国类别股制度构建提供了法律方面的建议。首先,本文对类别股制度相关内容进行了概述,对类别股的含义进行了界定,并根据类别股上权利内容的不同对其类型进行了划分,同时阐述了类别股制度的法理基础即章程自治和法定主义原则及股权实质平等原则,并对类别股制度的功能价值进行了分析,论证了我国构建类别股制度的必要性;其次,本文对类别股制度在部分商事发达国家的立法实践进行了分析,总结了这些国家的类别股制度立法特点,作为后文对我国类别股制度构建提出建议的基础;再次,本文对类别股制度在我国的发展现状进行了概述,虽然我国未全面构建类别股制度,但是优先股作为类别股种类之一,已在我国实践中进行了运用,并有相关法规进行约束,通过对我国类别股制度发展现状的分析,提出我国构建类别股制度可能面临的问题障碍;第五部分针对我国构建类别股制度面临的障碍提出解决思路,一方面是立法模式的选择,另一方面是对欲引入的类别股的具体设计思路,最后,类别股制度的构建可能导致股东间利益冲突的加剧,为确保我国类别股制度的顺利构建和实施,提出配套的冲突解决机制。本文按照分析现状——提出问题——解决问题的思路,对我国类别股制度的构建提出了自己建议,尤其对我国类别股制度的立法路径选择、我国类别股的多样化设计、类别股制度的保护和救济机制进行了详细的论述。
[Abstract]:Class share system is a set of systems designed to categorize shares according to the content of rights and be supplemented by special protection. This system has been widely used in countries or regions with mature corporate legal systems, such as the United States, Britain, and the United States, the United Kingdom, the United States and the United Kingdom. Germany, Japan, China, Taiwan, etc. Based on the comparative analysis of the legislative practice of the commercial developed countries in the construction of the category share system, this paper provides legal suggestions for the construction of the category share system in our country in the light of the actual situation, legal system and practice habits of our country. First of all, this paper summarizes the relevant contents of the category stock system, defines the meaning of the category stock, and divides its type according to the content of the right on the category stock. At the same time, this paper expounds the legal basis of the category stock system, that is, the principle of autonomy of articles of association and the principle of statutory doctrine and the principle of equity substantive equality, and analyzes the functional value of the system of category shares, and demonstrates the necessity of constructing the system of category shares in our country. Secondly, this paper analyzes the legislative practice of the category share system in some commercial developed countries, summarizes the legislative characteristics of the category share system in these countries, as the basis for the later suggestions on the construction of the category share system in our country; Thirdly, this paper summarizes the development of the category stock system in China. Although China has not fully constructed the category stock system, the preferred stock, as one of the categories of shares, has been used in practice in our country. Through the analysis of the current situation of the development of China's category stock system, this paper puts forward the problems and obstacles that our country may face in constructing the category share system. In the fifth part, the author puts forward some solutions to the obstacles to the construction of the category stock system in China. On the one hand, it is the choice of the legislative model, on the other hand, it is the specific design idea of the category stock to be introduced. Finally, The construction of the system of category shares may lead to the intensification of conflicts of interest among shareholders. In order to ensure the smooth construction and implementation of the system of category shares in China, a supporting conflict resolution mechanism is put forward. According to the thinking of analyzing the current situation-putting forward problems-solving problems, this paper puts forward some suggestions on the construction of China's category stock system, especially on the choice of legislative path of our country's category stock system, and the diversification design of our country's category stock system. The protection and relief mechanism of the category-share system is discussed in detail.
【学位授予单位】:长春工业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D922.287

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前9条

1 齐治兰;;股东平等与股权平等的关系[J];中国商界(上半月);2009年09期

2 李慧玲;股权平等之立法完善[J];行政与法(吉林省行政学院学报);2000年01期

3 周海博;刘铮谕;;论股权平等到股东平等[J];法制与经济(下半月);2008年05期

4 尹志海;;一股一票与股份制企业的股权平等[J];当代经济(下半月);2008年05期

5 尹志海;;一股一票、资本多数决与股权平等[J];北方经济;2008年14期

6 钱芳;;论外商投资股份有限公司的法律性质及特点[J];佳木斯教育学院学报;2013年10期

7 秦少相;;我国第一部《证券法》即将出台——访全国人大法律委员会副主任厉以宁[J];刊授党校;1994年03期

8 任尔昕;;关于我国设置公司种类股的思考[J];中国法学;2010年06期

9 ;[J];;年期

相关重要报纸文章 前4条

1 中国人民大学商法研究所所长 刘俊海;发展混合所有制应遵循股权平等原则[N];中国证券报;2014年

2 刘俊海;发展混合所有制经济亟须弘扬股权平等精神[N];中国经济时报;2014年

3 中国社科院金融研究中心 中天证券研究院 王国刚;创业板积极面对“一股独大”(上)[N];中国证券报;2001年

4 华东政法大学 张大海;有限责任公司股东平等购买权探析[N];人民法院报;2010年

相关硕士学位论文 前5条

1 汪敏枝;论类别股的公司法规范[D];武汉大学;2017年

2 谢仙莉;我国类别股制度建立之构思[D];长春工业大学;2017年

3 韩伟;公司以“合伙人制度”上市的法律问题[D];西南政法大学;2015年

4 盛伟伟;我国种类股制度研究[D];中国政法大学;2012年

5 李佳;类别股法律制度研究[D];华东政法大学;2013年



本文编号:2318986

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2318986.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户7ed1e***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com