旅游合同履行辅助人的法律责任研究
发布时间：2019-04-23 08:44
【摘要】：旅游经济活动中,旅行社主要是作为旅游服务产品的整合者或搬运工角色而非具体产品服务的实际生产者和服务提供者。旅行社通常借助其他旅游经营者向旅游者提供旅游合同中的服务,如此使得旅游纠纷案件中的主体身份多元,法律关系复杂,致使案件解决难度大。《最高人民法院关于审理旅游纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的规定》和《旅游法》先后对明确实际提供旅游服务者的法律地位和厘清主体间法律责任的承担作出了努力。目前,由于《旅游法》中的“履行辅助人”与《合同法》第65条中的“第三人”、《合同法》第64条中的“债务人”、《最高人民法院关于审理旅游纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的规定》中的“旅游辅助服务者”、传统民法体系中的“债务履行辅助人”概念之间的关系不明,致使对于旅游法中“履行辅助人”的法律地位的理论基础存有多种不同的见解。在其他的概念内涵影响下,包价旅游合同中履行辅助人与组团社、旅游者三者之间的法律地位及权利义务关系没有稳定可靠的法律根基。因而对履行辅助人地位的合理界定、明确其法律地位、才是规范纠纷主体间责任的关键。《中华人民共和国旅游法》作为解决旅游纠纷争议的首要法律依据,在《旅游纠纷若干规定》基础上对包价旅游合同中履行辅助人的法律地位及责任做了进一步的修缮,新旧法律之间该如何衔接需要得到妥善的处理。本论文拟通过对有关包价旅游合同履行辅助人的争议概念及内涵进行辨析,对新、老法律予以比较分析以探讨相关法律条文蕴含的理论根基,结合司法实践中法院裁判案例剖析包价旅游合同中履行辅助人的法律地位和责任的构成。本文认为《旅游法》以实际旅游活动当中旅行社、旅游者、履行辅助人三者之间缔结的合同关系为基础加上合同履行的实际履行效果进行构架定义的“履行辅助人”与其他的争议概念均不相同。
[Abstract]:In tourism economic activities, travel agencies are mainly as integrators or porters of tourism service products rather than actual producers and service providers of specific product services. Travel agencies usually use other tour operators to provide tourists with services in tourism contracts, so that the identity of the subject in tourism dispute cases is diversified, and the legal relationship is complex. The provisions of the Supreme people's Court on the application of the law in the handling of tourism disputes and the Tourism Law have successively clarified the legal status of the actual providers of tourism services and clarified the inter-main bodies. Efforts have been made to assume legal responsibility. At present, as a result of the "performing assistant" in the Tourism Law and the "third party" in Article 65 of the contract Law, the "debtor" in Article 64 of the contract Law, "the provisions of the Supreme people's Court on certain issues concerning the Application of Law in handling Tourism disputes", "Tourism Auxiliary Service" in the traditional civil law system, do not know the relationship between the concept of "debt-fulfilling auxiliary person" in the traditional civil law system. As a result, there are many different opinions on the theoretical basis of the legal status of "fulfilling the assistant" in the tourism law. Under the influence of other concepts, there is no stable and reliable legal foundation for the legal status and the relationship between the rights and obligations among the accomplices, the association and the tourists in the contract of package price tourism. Therefore, it is the key to standardize the responsibility of the main body of disputes to define reasonably the status of accomplices and to clarify their legal status. The Tourism Law of the people's Republic of China is the primary legal basis for resolving disputes in tourism disputes. On the basis of some regulations on tourism disputes, the legal status and responsibilities of accomplices in package price travel contracts are further repaired, and how to link the old and new laws to each other needs to be properly dealt with. This paper intends to analyze the controversial concept and connotation of the assistant in the performance of the package tourism contract, and make a comparative analysis of the new and the old laws in order to explore the theoretical foundation contained in the relevant legal provisions. Combined with the judicial practice, the author analyzes the legal status and responsibility of the assistant in the contract of package price tourism. In this paper, the author thinks that the travel agency, the tourist, and the tourist in the actual tourism activities. On the basis of the contractual relationship concluded among the performing aides and the actual performance effect of the contract performance, the definition of "performing assistant" is different from other controversial concepts.
【学位授予单位】：江西财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.294
本文编号：2463309
[Abstract]:In tourism economic activities, travel agencies are mainly as integrators or porters of tourism service products rather than actual producers and service providers of specific product services. Travel agencies usually use other tour operators to provide tourists with services in tourism contracts, so that the identity of the subject in tourism dispute cases is diversified, and the legal relationship is complex. The provisions of the Supreme people's Court on the application of the law in the handling of tourism disputes and the Tourism Law have successively clarified the legal status of the actual providers of tourism services and clarified the inter-main bodies. Efforts have been made to assume legal responsibility. At present, as a result of the "performing assistant" in the Tourism Law and the "third party" in Article 65 of the contract Law, the "debtor" in Article 64 of the contract Law, "the provisions of the Supreme people's Court on certain issues concerning the Application of Law in handling Tourism disputes", "Tourism Auxiliary Service" in the traditional civil law system, do not know the relationship between the concept of "debt-fulfilling auxiliary person" in the traditional civil law system. As a result, there are many different opinions on the theoretical basis of the legal status of "fulfilling the assistant" in the tourism law. Under the influence of other concepts, there is no stable and reliable legal foundation for the legal status and the relationship between the rights and obligations among the accomplices, the association and the tourists in the contract of package price tourism. Therefore, it is the key to standardize the responsibility of the main body of disputes to define reasonably the status of accomplices and to clarify their legal status. The Tourism Law of the people's Republic of China is the primary legal basis for resolving disputes in tourism disputes. On the basis of some regulations on tourism disputes, the legal status and responsibilities of accomplices in package price travel contracts are further repaired, and how to link the old and new laws to each other needs to be properly dealt with. This paper intends to analyze the controversial concept and connotation of the assistant in the performance of the package tourism contract, and make a comparative analysis of the new and the old laws in order to explore the theoretical foundation contained in the relevant legal provisions. Combined with the judicial practice, the author analyzes the legal status and responsibility of the assistant in the contract of package price tourism. In this paper, the author thinks that the travel agency, the tourist, and the tourist in the actual tourism activities. On the basis of the contractual relationship concluded among the performing aides and the actual performance effect of the contract performance, the definition of "performing assistant" is different from other controversial concepts.
【学位授予单位】：江西财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.294
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 汪旭鹏;;旅游合同违约精神损害赔偿的路径选择[J];太原理工大学学报(社会科学版);2015年05期
2 汪旭鹏;;《旅游法》履行辅助人制度评析[J];旅游学刊;2015年09期
3 解亘;;再论《合同法》第121条的存废——以履行辅助人责任论为视角[J];现代法学;2014年06期
4 薛杉;;旅游纠纷民事责任配置若干问题研究——以“焦建军旅游侵权纠纷案”为中心[J];政治与法律;2014年07期
5 周江洪;;从“旅游辅助服务者”到“履行辅助人”[J];旅游学刊;2013年09期
6 周晓晨;;论旅游服务提供者在包价旅游合同中的法律地位及责任[J];旅游学刊;2013年07期
7 张力毅;;比较与定位:中国法上旅游辅助服务者概念与责任体系解构[J];旅游学刊;2012年12期
8 杨立新;;论不真正连带责任类型体系及规则[J];当代法学;2012年03期
9 苏号朋;唐慧俊;;论旅游辅助服务者的法律地位及责任承担[J];法学杂志;2011年06期
10 涂慧;;试论中国个人信息的法律保护[J];西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2010年02期
，本文编号：2463309
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2463309.html
