高通垄断案中搭售行为的法律规制问题研究

发布时间：2019-05-09 10:36

【摘要】：作为在世界范围内最具影响力的竞争法体系之一,欧盟竞争法对滥用市场支配地位行为的规制有着丰富的立法与实践经验。搭售是常见的滥用市场支配地位行为之一,不仅妨碍了相关市场中的公平竞争,而且损害了消费者利益。欧盟竞争法认定搭售时除了有完备的法律分析模式,还有经济理论作为支撑。我国《反垄断法》对搭售只进行了原则性规定,缺乏可操作性。2015年3月国家发展与改革委员会(以下称为发改委)对美国高通公司(以下称为高通)滥用市场支配地位的行为做出了行政处罚决定(发改办监处罚[2015]1号)。在该决定中,发改委对高通在无线标准必要专利领域中搭售非无线标准必要专利的滥用行为进行了认定。本文将借鉴欧盟竞争法以及经典判例微软搭售案(2004),对高通垄断案中的搭售行为进行法律分析。文章由五个章节组成。第一章为绪论。本章介绍了文章研究背景及意义、研究现状及研究方法。第二章为搭售行为概论。本章一方面从经济分析与法律分析对搭售行为的合法合理性进行认定；另一方面,本章借鉴欧盟竞争法经验,对搭售的构成要件进行了分析。第三章为高通垄断案及搭售。这一章阐述了高通的市场支配地位,总结分析了高通在无线标准必要专利领域中的搭售行为。第四章为2004微软案与高通垄断案中的搭售的对比分析。本章主要介绍了2004年微软搭售案,并根据其认定步骤对高通垄断案中的搭售行为进行一一对比分析,发现认定高通搭售行为时出现的问题。第五章为结论和建议。为完善我国《反垄断法》中的搭售行为制度,这一章从法律原则的界定,经济因素的考虑,案例指导作用的发挥和司法解释的完善四个方面提出建议。
[Abstract]:As one of the most influential competition law systems in the world, EU competition law has rich legislative and practical experience in regulating the abuse of market dominance. Tie-in sale is one of the common abuses of market dominance, which not only impedes fair competition in the relevant markets, but also harms the interests of consumers. EU competition law recognizes that there is not only a complete legal analysis model, but also economic theory. China's Anti-monopoly Law only provides for binding sales in principle. Lack of maneuverability. In March 2015, the National Development and Reform Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Development and Reform Commission) made an administrative penalty decision on the abuse of market dominance by Qualcomm (hereinafter referred to as Qualcomm). Penalty [2015] 1 In the decision, the NDRC determined that Qualcomm had misused the sale of non-wireless standard essential patents in the area of wireless standard essential patents. This article will draw lessons from the European Union competition law and the classic case Microsoft tie-up case (2004), to Qualcomm monopoly case tie-up sale behavior to carry on the legal analysis. The article consists of five chapters. The first chapter is the introduction. This chapter introduces the research background and significance, research status and research methods. The second chapter is the introduction to the act of tie-in sale. This chapter on the one hand from the economic analysis and legal analysis of the legitimate rationality of the tie-in sale; on the other hand, this chapter refers to the experience of the EU competition law, analyzes the constituent elements of the tie-in sale. The third chapter is Qualcomm monopoly case and tie-in sale. This chapter describes Qualcomm's dominant position in the market, summarizes and analyzes Qualcomm's tied-up behavior in the field of wireless standard patents. The fourth chapter is the comparative analysis of 2004 Microsoft case and Qualcomm monopoly case. This chapter mainly introduces the 2004 Microsoft resale case, and makes a comparative analysis of the tied behavior in the Qualcomm monopoly case according to its identification steps, and finds out the problems that arise in the determination of the Qualcomm monopoly case. Chapter V is conclusions and recommendations. In order to perfect the binding behavior system in the Anti-monopoly Law of our country, this chapter puts forward some suggestions from four aspects: the definition of legal principles, the consideration of economic factors, the play of the guiding role of cases and the perfection of judicial interpretation.
【学位授予单位】：北京理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D922.294

【相似文献】