审判实务中民间借贷与不当得利转化问题研究
发布时间：2019-05-22 04:55
【摘要】：先诉民间借贷,在未被法院支持的情况下转而诉不当得利是当下民事诉讼中一个值得关注的问题。当事人将民间借贷和不当得利作为两种诉讼策略在方法上是可行的,也并不构成滥用诉讼权利。在当事人诉不当得利的情况下,举证责任的分配不应完全按照规范说,而应当进行适当修正,以保证当事人双方实质的平等与公正。
[Abstract]:It is a problem worth paying attention to in the current civil litigation to sue for improper enrichment without the support of the court. It is feasible for the parties to regard private lending and unjust enrichment as two litigation strategies, and it does not constitute an abuse of litigation rights. In the case of the parties v. unjust enrichment, the distribution of the burden of proof should not be in full accordance with the norms, but should be properly amended to ensure the substantive equality and justice of both parties.
【作者单位】： 中国政法大学;
【基金】：中国政法大学研究生院“研究生创新实践项目”的资助,项目号:2015SSCX016
【分类号】：D922.282
本文编号：2482693
[Abstract]:It is a problem worth paying attention to in the current civil litigation to sue for improper enrichment without the support of the court. It is feasible for the parties to regard private lending and unjust enrichment as two litigation strategies, and it does not constitute an abuse of litigation rights. In the case of the parties v. unjust enrichment, the distribution of the burden of proof should not be in full accordance with the norms, but should be properly amended to ensure the substantive equality and justice of both parties.
【作者单位】： 中国政法大学;
【基金】：中国政法大学研究生院“研究生创新实践项目”的资助,项目号:2015SSCX016
【分类号】：D922.282
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 刘铁军;;论票据之不当得利返还[J];法学杂志;2010年12期
2 黄军;李琛;;损失填补原则探微[J];法学评论;2006年02期
3 ;[J];;年期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 田彬;浅析ATM机非正常交易的法律责任[N];金融时报;2005年
，本文编号：2482693
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2482693.html
