商事司法对商主体法定原则的突破

发布时间：2018-02-09 04:22

本文关键词： 商主体法定原则商事司法类推适用合理性　出处：《法学论坛》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：商主体法定原则为我国商法学界的通说,但该通说是我国学者对国外立法例的学理阐释,国外学理上并未有类似表达。商主体法定原则的前提是商主体的立法较为完备,不同商主体法之间的转介条款较为合理。我国目前的商主体立法不具备这样的条件,因此商主体法定原则不适合我国法制现状。司法实务当中对商主体原则多有突破,法院在处理商主体的纠纷过程中,常常用类推适用的方法解决纠纷,表现为同一商主体内部、不同商主体之间和民商事主体之间的类推适用。这种突破有其合理性,商主体法定本就是学理表达,其对法院审判活动并无实际的拘束力,商主体立法大量漏洞的存在迫使法院必须放弃商主体法定原则,从结果上来看,法院对商主体法定的突破带来积极的社会效果。尽管法院的类推适用在技术上存在一定的瑕疵,但法院做法本身并不应被批评,反倒是学理上应该放弃商主体法定原则。
[Abstract]:The legal principle of commercial subject is the general theory in the field of commercial law of our country, but this general theory is the academic explanation of foreign legislative example by Chinese scholars, and there is no similar expression in foreign theory. The premise of the principle of statutory principle of commercial subject is that the legislation of commercial subject is relatively complete. The terms of reference between different commercial subject laws are more reasonable. The current legislation of commercial subjects in our country does not have such conditions, so the principle of legal law of commercial subjects is not suitable for the present legal situation of our country. In judicial practice, there is a breakthrough in the principle of commercial subject. In the process of dealing with the disputes of the commercial subjects, the court often solves the disputes by analogy, which is manifested in the analogical application of the same commercial subjects, different commercial subjects and civil and commercial subjects. The legal basis of commercial subject is the expression of theory, and it has no practical binding force on the court's trial activities. The existence of a large number of loopholes in the legislation of commercial subject forces the court to give up the principle of the legal principle of commercial subject, and from the point of view of the result, Although there are some technical flaws in the application of analogies of the court, the practice of the court itself should not be criticized, but on the contrary, it should give up the legal principle of the commercial subject in theory.
【作者单位】：黑龙江大学法学院;
【分类号】：D923.99

【相似文献】