网络侵权中服务商过错责任研究

发布时间：2018-04-02 20:51

本文选题：网络服务商　切入点：过错责任　出处：《宁波大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】：网络服务提供商是不可忽视的网络主体,其侵权责任的承担,以过错责任为限,已成共识。但网络服务商过错责任如何认定?责任受到何种限制?目前尚无定论。本文结合网络服务商侵权责任的变迁,分析网络服务商的过错判定及责任的承担。第一部分,通过分析网络服务商的各种不同分类,在讨论网络侵权中服务商的责任时,将服务商的服务类型分为提供接入服务、内容服务、平台服务三大类。提供不同服务的网络服务商,其侵权责任认定也有所不同。国际的立法趋势表明,网络服务商在网络侵权中承担过错责任,有利于信息传播和技术进步,有其必然性和合理性。第二部分,结合传统侵权法理论分析,网络服务商过错的认定应当采取客观标准。网络服务商违反注意义务,即存在过错。网络服务商在提供接入服务、内容服务、平台服务时对信息控制能力不同,应承担的注意义务也不同。第三部分,分析停止侵害、消除影响、赔礼道歉、赔偿损失等主要责任承担方式在网络侵权中适用的特殊性。结合立法对网络服务商责任进行限制的趋势,分析网络服务商法定免责事由、合同免责、免责声明等不同的责任限制方式的优劣。第四部分,分析我国网络服务商侵权责任的立法现状,结合其他国家和地区的立法例,对完善我国的相关立法提出明确网络服务商概念、完善过错判定标准、对网络服务商责任作进一步限制等建议,对侵权责任法的相关条文进行评析。
[Abstract]:The network service provider is the network main body which can not be ignored, its tort liability is limited by the fault liability, has already become the consensus.But how to identify the fault liability of network service provider?What are the limitations on liability?There is no conclusion yet.Combined with the change of tort liability of network service provider, this paper analyzes the fault judgment and liability assumption of network service provider.In the first part, by analyzing the different categories of network service providers, when discussing the liability of service providers in network infringement, the service types of service providers are divided into three categories: access service, content service and platform service.Network service providers provide different services, their tort liability is also different.The trend of international legislation shows that network service providers bear fault liability in network infringement, which is beneficial to information dissemination and technological progress, and has its inevitability and rationality.In the second part, combined with the theory of traditional tort law, the identification of fault of network service provider should adopt objective standard.Network service providers violate the duty of care, that is, there is fault.When providing access service, content service and platform service, the network service provider has different ability to control information, and should bear different duty of attention.The third part analyzes the particularity of stopping infringement, eliminating influence, apologizing, compensating for loss and so on.Combined with the trend of legislation to restrict the liability of network service providers, this paper analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the different ways of limiting the liability of network service providers, such as legal reasons, contract disclaimers, disclaimers, and so on.In the fourth part, the author analyzes the legislation status of tort liability of network service provider in our country. Combining with the legislation of other countries and regions, it puts forward a clear concept of network service provider and perfect the standard of fault judgment to perfect the relevant legislation of our country.Some suggestions such as further limitation of network service provider's liability are proposed, and the relevant provisions of tort liability law are evaluated.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D923

【引证文献】