当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 商法论文 >

“深石原则”相关法律问题研究

发布时间:2018-04-03 15:11

  本文选题:“深石原则” 切入点:母公司与债权人利益冲突 出处:《四川大学》2005年硕士论文


【摘要】:“深石原则”产生于美国判例,它是一个对子公司破产程序中母公司债权受偿问题的处理原则,其实质精神与关联企业立法体系是一致的,并能与其他规则相配合起到不可替代的作用。这一原则对解决我国现实中存在的母公司利用债权方式攫取子公司资产、损害子公司其他债权人和股东利益的问题有很大的借鉴意义。 但目前国内已有的对关联企业和公司人格否认制度的研究较多集中在对相关理论的介绍、在我国建立相应制度的必要性、意义与可行性等较宏观的领域,对“深石原则”多在谈到公司法人格否认制度时一并带过,在“深石原则”的具体运用如母公司债权居次的程度、条件、后果,具体处理措施与处理程序,不同类型债权的处理原则是否应有所不同,“深石原则”与我国现有法律的融合等问题上没有深入、专门的研究。目前学界对引入“深石原则”的必要性已基本没有争议,最高人民法院《关于审理公司纠纷案件若干问题的规定(一)(征求意见稿)》对“深石原则”的引入也体现了司法界的积极态度。但由于“深石原则”是产生于英美法系判例法的制度,一旦引入我国法律体系,如何将其纳入现有的债权法体系内,使其成为在理论上与我国现有民商法体系相协调,在实践上具有可操作性的制度是有待解决的问题。因此,笔者在现有研究成果的基础上,就其中的缺陷和未及部分进行分析论证,以期能对理论和实践有所裨益。 本文除文献综述和结语部分外,正文采用章下分节的结构模式,共六章。各章节主要内容如下:
[Abstract]:The "Deep Stone principle" is a principle to deal with the problem of compensation of the parent company's creditor's rights in the bankruptcy proceedings of the subsidiary company, and its essence is consistent with the legislative system of the affiliated enterprise.And can cooperate with other rules to play an irreplaceable role.This principle can be used for reference to solve the problem that the parent company grabs subsidiary assets by creditor's rights and damages the interests of other creditors and shareholders in our country.However, the existing researches on the personality denial system of affiliated enterprises and companies have focused on the introduction of relevant theories, the necessity, significance and feasibility of establishing the corresponding system in China.The "deep stone principle" is often brought with it when it comes to the system of denying corporate personality, and the concrete application of the "deep stone principle" such as the degree, condition, consequence, concrete treatment measures and processing procedure of the parent company's creditor's rights,Whether the principles of dealing with different types of creditor's rights should be different or not, there is no deep and special research on the fusion of the deep stone principle and the existing law of our country.At present, there is no dispute in academic circles about the necessity of introducing the "deep stone principle".The introduction of the "Deep Stone principle" by the Supreme people's Court on several issues concerning the trial of disputes in companies (draft of soliciting opinions) also reflects the positive attitude of the judiciary.However, since the "deep stone principle" is a system of case law in common law system, once it is introduced into the legal system of our country, how to bring it into the existing creditor's rights law system and make it coordinate with the existing civil and commercial law system of our country in theory.In practice, the operational system is a problem to be solved.Therefore, on the basis of the existing research results, the author analyzes and demonstrates the defects and the missing parts in order to benefit the theory and practice.In addition to the literature review and the conclusion part, the text adopts the structure model of the subsections under the chapter, which consists of six chapters.The main contents of the chapters are as follows:
【学位授予单位】:四川大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2005
【分类号】:D922.291.91

【引证文献】

相关期刊论文 前1条

1 黎明;;浅析衡平居次原则对我国法律完善的意义[J];新乡学院学报(社会科学版);2010年03期

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 孙向齐;关联企业破产法律问题研究[D];中国人民大学;2008年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 杨惠惠;关联交易下债权人保护制度研究[D];华东政法大学;2010年

2 刘济源;论破产分配中的债权公平居次规则[D];中国政法大学;2011年

3 汪红丽;关联企业违法破产立法规制研究[D];西南政法大学;2011年

4 张存洁;“深石原则”法律适用研究[D];苏州大学;2011年

5 贺峰;论公司集团中深石原则的运用[D];中国政法大学;2006年

6 祝廷彦;衡平居次原则适用研究[D];湖南师范大学;2007年

7 胡威;关联企业破产外部债权人利益保护研究[D];中南大学;2009年

8 杜笑;衡平居次原则研究[D];复旦大学;2010年

9 郭凡;不正当关联交易的民事责任问题研究[D];南昌大学;2010年

10 赵嵩巍;论“深石原则”与非正当关联交易的法律规制[D];东北师范大学;2012年



本文编号:1705735

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/sflw/1705735.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户d7a34***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com