中国法下船舶所有权变动的交付生效要件与特约例外

发布时间：2018-05-25 02:04

本文选题：海商法 + 物权法　；参考：《上海海事大学学报》2014年01期

【摘要】：为探讨2012年3月31日最高人民法院发布的《最高人民法院关于审理买卖合同纠纷案件适用法律问题的解释》(以下称《解释》)第10条规定中存在的相关问题,根据我国《海商法》和《物权法》船舶所有权变动的规定,阐述《解释》第10条第1款和第3款规定在适用中可能产生的问题,指出:为避免引起歧义,有必要进一步明确,该第10条的解释应不适用于一船多卖下的某一买方根据船舶买卖合同约定的条件已合法取得船舶所有权的情况.当该买方已根据买卖合同的约定合法取得船舶所有权,依据物权主张权利时,请求权应当优先于其他买方的债权请求权.这样的解释符合私法自治的精神,也更有利于保护交易安全,鼓励船舶贸易的发展.
[Abstract]:In order to explore the relevant problems existing in Article 10 of the Supreme people's Court's interpretation of the legal issues applicable to the trial of disputes over sale and purchase contracts issued by the Supreme people's Court on March 31, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as "interpretation"), According to the regulations of the change of ship ownership in the Maritime Law and the property Law of China, the article 10, paragraphs 1 and 3, which may arise in the application of the provisions of the interpretation, are discussed. It is pointed out that in order to avoid causing ambiguity, it is necessary to further clarify. The interpretation of article 10 shall not apply where a buyer who has sold more than one ship has lawfully acquired ownership of the ship in accordance with the conditions agreed upon in the contract of sale and purchase of the ship. When the buyer has legally acquired the ownership of the ship in accordance with the agreement of the contract of sale and purchase, and claims the right on the basis of real right, the right of claim shall take precedence over the claim of other buyers. This interpretation accords with the spirit of private law autonomy, also helps to protect the security of trade and encourage the development of ship trade.
【作者单位】：上海海事大学法学院;
【基金】：上海海事大学校基金(20130440)
【分类号】：D922.294;D923.6

【相似文献】