海上货物留置权研究

发布时间：2018-07-06 08:12

本文选题：留置权 + 海上货物留置权　；参考：《华东政法学院》2005年硕士论文

【摘要】： 《中华人民共和国海商法》(以下简称海商法)明确规定承运人依法享有海上货物留置权，但航运实务中承运人往往感到要真正行使留置权并非易事。这不但因为海上货物运输法律关系特别复杂，也因为海商法的规定模糊和隐晦，使人们很难准确理解其规定的真正意义。即使是经验丰富的法官，有时也很难作出正确的判断。全文由以下六个部分组成：第一部分是海上货物留置权的概念。通过留置权制度概述，进而深入讨论海上货物留置权的概念，并对与其容易产生混淆的其他海上留詈权如船舶优先权等作了简要论述，指出他们之间的区别。第二部分为海上货物留置权的取得。主要论述取得海上货物留置权应同时具备的条件，特别是对被认为与海运货物有牵连关系的承运人的债权作了充分说明。第三部分分析海上货物留置权的标的和提单、租船合同中的留置权条款性质、效力这两个海上货物留置权的特殊问题。第四部分是海上货物留置权的行使。主要论述了它的行使要件和行使程序，，还简要论述了其与海事请求权保全的联系和区别。第五部分是海上货物留置权的消灭，简要论述了导致海上货物留置权消灭的主要原因。第六部分为全文的结论。指出海上货物留置权取得、行使甚至构成要件与一般留置权有很大区别，提出对海商法第87条进行修改的具体建议。
[Abstract]:The Maritime Law of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as "Maritime Law") clearly stipulates that the carrier shall enjoy the lien right of goods on the sea according to law, but in the practice of shipping, the carrier often feels that it is not easy to really exercise the lien. This is not only because the legal relationship of carriage of goods by sea is particularly complicated, but also because the provisions of maritime law are vague and obscure, making it difficult for people to accurately understand the true meaning of the provisions. Even experienced judges can sometimes find it difficult to make a correct judgment. The thesis consists of the following six parts: the first part is the concept of maritime cargo lien. Through the outline of lien system, the concept of lien for marine goods is discussed in depth, and the differences between lien and other marine liens, such as maritime lien, which are easily confused with lien, are briefly discussed, and the differences between them are pointed out. The second part is the acquisition of maritime cargo lien. This paper mainly discusses the conditions for obtaining lien on sea cargo, especially the claims of carriers who are considered to be involved in marine cargo. The third part analyzes the subject matter and bill of lading of the marine goods lien, the nature and validity of the lien clause in the charter party. The fourth part is the exercise of maritime cargo lien. This paper mainly discusses the requirements and procedures of its exercise, and briefly discusses the relationship and difference between it and the preservation of maritime claim. The fifth part is the elimination of maritime cargo lien, briefly discusses the main reasons leading to the elimination of marine cargo lien. The sixth part is the conclusion of the full text. It is pointed out that there is great difference between the acquisition, exercise and even constitutive elements of lien on marine goods and general lien, and some specific suggestions for amending Article 87 of Maritime Law are put forward.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2005
【分类号】：D922.294;D923

【相似文献】