论盗赃物的民法调整

发布时间：2018-07-10 01:48

本文选题：盗赃物 + 占有　；参考：《湖南大学》2009年硕士论文

【摘要】： 盗赃物是违法犯罪主体使用盗窃、抢夺、抢劫违法犯罪行为所得之物,并不包括欺诈、侵占所产生之物。盗赃物具有是由违法犯罪行为所产生的物、是违法犯罪主体实现其违法犯罪目的及其利益之物、范围具有狭义性等特点。盗赃物的民法调整主要包括盗赃物与所有权保护、盗赃物与占有制度、盗赃物与善意取得制度。占有为权利的外衣。随着社会的发展,人们越来越注重物的利用,对所有权的保护日渐走向松动,越来越注重非所有者合法权益的保护以保护交易安全。罗马法上的占有制度与日耳曼上的占有制度日益融合,盗赃物占有制度的适用体现了现代民法的发展方向。盗赃物的善意取得在世界各国有不同的立法模式:不适用善意取得、原则不适用善意取得、完全适用善意取得。目前我国物权法虽然规定了善意取得制度,但盗赃物并不适用善意取得制度。盗赃物固有的法律属性形成了其法律调整涉及刑事法、行政法、民商法众多法律。就盗赃物民法调整缺失来说主要表现在:法出多门且不尽规范、没有专门法律规定盗赃物的民法调整、没有区分占有委托物与占有脱离物、没有区分盗赃物善意取得的地点及盗赃物的种类。当前,我国处于社会主义初级阶段,市场经济体制还在建立之中,整个国家表现出盗抢犯罪高发的阶段性特征。以绝对保护所有权的民法思维、立法模式实际上已经明显滞后于社会的发展,越来越不利于保护交易安全,越来越不利于物尽其用。为此,可以采取统一立法主体、专门规定盗赃物的民法调整、区分盗赃物取得的地点及种类、区分占有委托物与占有脱离物等方式加以完善。
[Abstract]:Theft of stolen goods is the use of theft, seizure, robbery illegal crime proceeds, not including fraud, usurpation. Theft of stolen goods is produced by illegal criminal acts, is the subject of illegal crime to achieve its criminal purpose and interests, the scope of narrow and other characteristics. The civil law adjustment of stolen goods mainly includes theft of stolen goods and protection of ownership, theft of stolen goods and possession system, theft of stolen goods and bona fide acquisition system. Possession is the cloak of power. With the development of society, people pay more and more attention to the use of things, the protection of ownership is becoming more and more loose, and more attention is paid to the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of non-owners in order to protect the security of transactions. The possessive system in Roman law and the possessive system in Germanic law are merging day by day. The application of stolen goods possession system embodies the development direction of modern civil law. The bona fide acquisition of stolen goods has different legislative models in various countries in the world: it does not apply to bona fide acquisition, the principle of bona fide acquisition is not applicable to bona fide acquisition, and it is completely applicable to bona fide acquisition. At present, the system of bona fide acquisition is stipulated in the property Law of our country, but the system of bona fide acquisition is not applicable to stolen goods. The inherent legal attribute of stolen property forms its legal adjustment involving criminal law, administrative law and civil and commercial law. In terms of the deficiency of the civil law adjustment of stolen goods, it is mainly manifested in the following aspects: the law has many doors and is not standardized, there is no special law to regulate the civil law of stolen goods, and there is no distinction between possession of entrusted goods and possession of detached goods. There is no distinction between the place where stolen goods were obtained in good faith and the types of stolen goods. At present, our country is in the primary stage of socialism, the market economy system is still being established, the whole country shows the stage characteristic of the crime of theft and robbery. With the thinking of absolute protection of ownership in civil law, the legislative model has obviously lagged behind the development of society, which is more and more unfavorable to the protection of transaction security and to the best use of goods. Therefore, we can adopt unified legislative subject, regulate the civil law of stolen goods, distinguish the location and type of stolen goods, and distinguish the possession of entrustment from possession of detached property, and so on.
【学位授予单位】：湖南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】