论电子认证服务机构在认证服务中承担的民事法律责任
发布时间：2018-08-03 09:26
【摘要】：如电子认证服务机构违反保证主体身份识别、数据电文的机密完整有效的原则性义务给电子签名人、依赖人造成损害,应承担损害赔偿责任。作者通过批判各种不承认电子认证服务机构在认证服务中对依赖人承担的责任是侵权责任的观点,并借鉴相关立法例,提出本文观点:在电子认证服务机构违反保证主体身份识别、数据电文机密完整有效的义务前提下,对签名人承担合同责任,对依赖人承担侵权责任。之后,在我国传统民法理论并结合德国、我国台湾相关理论的基础上,文章对此进行了进一步论述。电子认证服务机构对签名人承担的合同责任体现在:订约过程中因拒绝服务给签名人造成损害时电子认证机构承担缔约过失责任、签名人无法签名或证书被人非法使用时认证机构承担违约责任、证书撤销后违反后合同义务时比照违约责任处理。电子认证服务机构对依赖人的责任符合侵权责任的四构成要件:电子认证服务机构违反保护第三人之法律的行为构成违法行为;该行为损害了依赖人的利益构成损害事实;损害事实与违法行为之间存在因果关系;电子认证服务机构与签名人串通时对依赖人的损害存在故意,未串通时存在过失。电子认证服务机构对依赖人的责任宜采过错推定原则,责任的形态以补充责任为主,实行有限赔偿原则。
[Abstract]:If the electronic authentication service organization violates the principle obligation of guaranteeing the subject identification, the confidentiality of the data message is complete and effective, and the electronic signer is injured by the relying person, it should be liable for damages. The author criticizes the view that the liability of the electronic certification service organization to the dependant is tort liability, and draws lessons from the relevant legislation. This paper puts forward the following points: under the premise that the electronic authentication service organization violates the obligation of ensuring the identity of the subject and the confidentiality of the data message, it bears the contract liability to the signer and the tort liability to the relying party. Then, on the basis of the traditional civil law theory of our country and the related theories of Germany and Taiwan, the article further discusses this. The contractual liability of the electronic certification service institution to the signer is embodied in the fact that the electronic certification organization shall bear the responsibility for the fault in the contract when it is damaged by the refusal of service during the contracting process, When the signer is unable to sign or the certificate is illegally used, the certification authority shall bear the responsibility for breach of contract, and the liability for breach of contract shall be dealt with in the event of breach of the contract obligation after the revocation of the certificate. The liability of the electronic authentication service organization meets the four constitutive requirements of the tort liability: the act of violating the law of protecting the third party constitutes an illegal act, which damages the interests of the dependent person and constitutes the fact of damage; There is a causal relationship between the fact of damage and the illegal act; the electronic authentication service organization has intentional damage to the relying person when colluding with the signer, and there is negligence in the absence of collusion. The electronic certification service adopts the principle of presumption of fault to the liability of relying person, the form of liability is supplementary liability, and the principle of limited compensation is adopted.
【学位授予单位】：广西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2005
【分类号】：D913.99
本文编号：2161313
[Abstract]:If the electronic authentication service organization violates the principle obligation of guaranteeing the subject identification, the confidentiality of the data message is complete and effective, and the electronic signer is injured by the relying person, it should be liable for damages. The author criticizes the view that the liability of the electronic certification service organization to the dependant is tort liability, and draws lessons from the relevant legislation. This paper puts forward the following points: under the premise that the electronic authentication service organization violates the obligation of ensuring the identity of the subject and the confidentiality of the data message, it bears the contract liability to the signer and the tort liability to the relying party. Then, on the basis of the traditional civil law theory of our country and the related theories of Germany and Taiwan, the article further discusses this. The contractual liability of the electronic certification service institution to the signer is embodied in the fact that the electronic certification organization shall bear the responsibility for the fault in the contract when it is damaged by the refusal of service during the contracting process, When the signer is unable to sign or the certificate is illegally used, the certification authority shall bear the responsibility for breach of contract, and the liability for breach of contract shall be dealt with in the event of breach of the contract obligation after the revocation of the certificate. The liability of the electronic authentication service organization meets the four constitutive requirements of the tort liability: the act of violating the law of protecting the third party constitutes an illegal act, which damages the interests of the dependent person and constitutes the fact of damage; There is a causal relationship between the fact of damage and the illegal act; the electronic authentication service organization has intentional damage to the relying person when colluding with the signer, and there is negligence in the absence of collusion. The electronic certification service adopts the principle of presumption of fault to the liability of relying person, the form of liability is supplementary liability, and the principle of limited compensation is adopted.
【学位授予单位】：广西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2005
【分类号】：D913.99
【引证文献】
相关硕士学位论文 前7条
1 帅兴国;电子认证之民事责任与风险防范[D];西南政法大学;2011年
2 王志远;论电子认证机构对信赖方的民事责任[D];苏州大学;2006年
3 孙志煜;电子认证机构民事责任问题研究[D];暨南大学;2007年
4 马丽萍;电子认证法律问题研究[D];山东大学;2007年
5 戚永福;电子签名认证法律责任承担机制研究[D];西南政法大学;2008年
6 杨丽虹;电子认证机构侵权责任研究[D];西南政法大学;2009年
7 吴青锋;电子签名认证机构的责任限制研究[D];暨南大学;2010年
，本文编号：2161313
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/sflw/2161313.html
