瑕疵出资股权转让之效力研究

发布时间：2018-08-18 11:38

【摘要】：股权转让是商事交易中最常见的活动之一，不仅关系着公司的稳定经营及有效运转，同时也对社会资源，特别是社会资金的配置有着重要的影响。“何建刚与何显玲股权转让纠纷上诉案”是我国股权转让纠纷案中的典型判例，它不是一起简单的股权转让纠纷案，而是涉及了瑕疵出资、股东资格认定、股权转让、合同效力认定等对公司、股东及债权人等当事人起着至关重要作用的问题。本文以该案为基础，探讨了认定瑕疵出资股权转让合同效力所引出的一系列问题。本文从以下四个部分进行了论述：第一部分，案情简介及所引出的问题。首先我们简约地介绍了主要案情，然后提出由案例所引出的关于瑕疵出资股权转让效力认定的三个问题：瑕疵出资人的出资行为是否构成瑕疵出资？瑕疵出资股权是否可以转让？瑕疵出资股权转让合同是否有效？第二部分，瑕疵出资内涵的分析。首先，由于目前学术界对瑕疵出资的含义还没有形成统一的认识，本文阐述了对瑕疵出资的内涵的一己之见；其次，探讨了瑕疵出资的原因并列举了瑕疵出资在实践中的几种表现；最后，结合本案，分析了第一部分提出的问题一，并对其作出了回应。第三部分，瑕疵出资股权的可转让性分析。分析瑕疵出资股权的可转让性的前提条件是要弄清楚瑕疵出资人是否具有股东资格，否则，一切问题都将无从谈起。本文首先阐述了瑕疵出资人具有公司股东资格，享有股东权利、承担股东义务的理论；其次，分析了瑕疵出资股权的可转让性；最后，结合本案，分析了第一部分提出的问题二，并肯定了瑕疵出资股权的可转让性。第四部分，瑕疵出资股权转让合同效力的认定。由于现阶段学术界关于瑕疵出资股权转让合同的效力认定存在不同学说，本文首先简单地介绍了这几种学说；其次，陈述了无效说、折中说及可撤销说的缺陷，论证了采用有效说的理由；最后，结合本案，分析了由案例引出的问题三，，对瑕疵出资股权转让合同的效力认定作出肯定回答。
[Abstract]:Equity transfer is one of the most common activities in commercial transactions, which is not only related to the stable operation and effective operation of the company, but also has an important impact on the allocation of social resources, especially social funds. He Jiangang and he Xianling's equity transfer dispute appeal case is a typical case in the case of equity transfer dispute in China. It is not a simple case of equity transfer dispute, but involves defective capital contribution, shareholder qualification determination, equity transfer. The determination of the validity of the contract plays an important role in the company, shareholders and creditors. Based on this case, this paper discusses a series of problems arising from the validity of the equity transfer contract. This article has carried on the elaboration from the following four parts: the first part, the case brief introduction and the question which elicits. First of all, we briefly introduce the main cases, and then put forward three questions about the validity of the transfer of defective capital contribution: whether the investment behavior of the defective investor constitutes the defective contribution? Is the defective contribution equity transferable? Is the transfer contract of defective capital contribution valid? The second part is the analysis of the connotation of defective investment. First of all, as the academic community has not formed a unified understanding of the meaning of defective investment, this paper expounds the connotation of the defective contribution of a view; secondly, This paper discusses the reasons of defective investment and enumerates several manifestations of defective investment in practice. Finally, combined with this case, it analyzes the first part of the question, and makes a response to it. The third part, the defect contribution equity transferability analysis. The precondition of analyzing the transferability of defective capital contribution is to find out whether the defective investor has the qualification of shareholders, otherwise, all problems will be impossible to talk about. This paper first expounds the theory that the defective investor has the qualification of shareholders, the rights of shareholders and the obligations of shareholders; secondly, analyzes the transferability of defective capital contribution; finally, combined with this case, The first part of the analysis of the second issue, and affirmed the transferability of defective equity. The fourth part, the confirmation of the validity of the equity transfer contract of defective capital contribution. Because there are different theories about the validity of the transfer contract of defective capital contribution in the academic circles at present, this paper first introduces these theories briefly; secondly, it states the defects of the invalid theory, the compromise theory and the theory of revocability. Finally, combining with the case, the author analyzes the problem three, and gives a positive answer to the validity of the transfer contract of defective capital contribution.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D923.99

【参考文献】