当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 商法论文 >

商会纠纷解决机制研究

发布时间:2018-09-11 16:07
【摘要】:商会纠纷解决机制也就是由商会这种民间社会团体解决纠纷的理念、规则、制度、方法和组织机构及活动等构成的体系。商业领域是公认的自治程度最高的社会领域,解决商事纠纷是早期东西方地方商会和行业商会的基本活动,也是其自治规则的一种“司法实践”。近现代中国商会解决商事纠纷的实践经历了从形成到规范,然后随现代法制的形成而衰落的过程。 我国历来强调运用民事诉讼程序解决商事纠纷,没有独立的商事审判制度,过分着眼于民、商事纠纷都是平等主体之间的社会关系共性的把握,忽略了商事纠纷与商事纠纷解决机制的特殊性以及商法的独立品格,出现了不利于纠纷解决的现象。基于此,本文通过对商会纠纷解决机制的历史沿革与现状的把握,在对商事纠纷和商事纠纷解决机制的特殊性分析的基础上,指出其他纠纷解决方式在解决商事纠纷方面的功能局限,进而提出商会纠纷解决机制在助力构建行业规范、缓解纠纷解决的刚性化、缓和情感对立、注重商事习惯和惯例、强调对专业技术性规范的运用等方面具有不可替代的优势,对于解决日益复杂、多发的商事纠纷有独特价值。赋予商会解决商事纠纷的职能,是商会自治性的延伸,也符合当下商事纠纷解决的制度性需求。 目前虽然我国商会组织较多,但由于其自治性的缺失和法律规定不明确,缺乏明确的职能界定和相应权力,在解决纠纷方面发挥功能有限,因而商会解决商事纠纷的制度成熟性取决于商会自身的组织建设和规范发展。本文建议,除了在法律层面对商会职能予以明确定位与规范,和在现实层面对商会自治予以鼓励和引导外,还应对其效力、制度保障、救济等方面进行一系列的制度设计,从而完善商会纠纷解决机制。
[Abstract]:The dispute resolution mechanism of chamber of commerce is a system of ideas, rules, systems, methods, organizations and activities of civil society organizations such as chambers of commerce. The commercial field is recognized as the social field with the highest degree of autonomy. The settlement of commercial disputes is the basic activity of the local chambers of commerce and trade chambers of the early East and West, and is also a kind of "judicial practice" of its autonomy rules. The practice of Chinese Chamber of Commerce in solving commercial disputes experienced from formation to norm, then declined with the formation of modern legal system. Our country has always emphasized the use of civil procedure to solve commercial disputes, there is no independent commercial trial system, too much attention to the people, commercial disputes are equal subjects of social relations between the common grasp. Ignoring the particularity of commercial dispute and the settlement mechanism of commercial dispute and the independent character of commercial law, the phenomenon is unfavorable to the settlement of disputes. Based on this, this paper analyzes the particularity of the settlement mechanism of commercial disputes and commercial disputes on the basis of grasping the historical evolution and present situation of the dispute resolution mechanism of the Chamber of Commerce, and on the basis of the analysis of the particularity of the settlement mechanism of commercial disputes and commercial disputes. The paper points out the functional limitations of other dispute resolution methods in resolving commercial disputes, and then points out that the dispute resolution mechanism of the Chamber of Commerce can help to construct industry norms, ease the rigidity of dispute resolution, ease the emotional antagonism, and pay attention to commercial habits and practices. It emphasizes the irreplaceable advantage in the application of professional technical norms, which is of unique value in solving the increasingly complex and frequent commercial disputes. Giving the Chamber of Commerce the function of resolving commercial disputes is an extension of its autonomy and meets the needs of the current commercial dispute resolution system. At present, although there are many chambers of commerce in our country, due to their lack of autonomy and unclear legal provisions, lack of clear definition of functions and corresponding powers, they play a limited role in the settlement of disputes. Therefore, the system maturity of the Chamber of Commerce in resolving commercial disputes depends on its own organizational construction and normative development. This paper suggests that in addition to clearly positioning and standardizing the functions of the Chamber of Commerce at the legal level and encouraging and guiding the autonomy of the Chamber of Commerce in the practical level, it should also carry out a series of system designs on its effectiveness, system protection, relief, etc. In order to improve the Chamber of Commerce dispute resolution mechanism.
【学位授予单位】:兰州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D925.1

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 张启耀;崔明霞;黄红莲;;清末商会调理经济纠纷的性质及评价[J];安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版);2008年01期

2 杨郁;;晋商商事纠纷解决机制研究[J];商业研究;2010年05期

3 周荃;;人民法院委托行业协会调解的实践及其规制——以金融纠纷调解为视角[J];北京政法职业学院学报;2011年04期

4 赵万一;;商法的独立性与商事审判的独立化[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2012年01期

5 江苏省高级人民法院"和谐社会与民事制度创新"课题组;;民事案件与商事案件适用诉讼调解的区分研究[J];法律适用;2008年11期

6 符喜;林珊;;论国际商会纠纷解决体系之“ADR”制度[J];法制与社会;2008年25期

7 陈剩勇,马斌;温州民间商会:自主治理的制度分析——温州服装商会的典型研究[J];管理世界;2004年12期

8 余冬爱;;民、商区分原则下的商事审判理念探析[J];人民司法;2011年03期

9 谈萧;;制度变迁中的自治秩序——以近代以来中国商会自治规则为例[J];山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年06期

10 常健;;清末民初商会裁判制度:法律形成与特点解析[J];上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年04期

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 穆子砺;论中国商事调解制度之构建[D];对外经济贸易大学;2006年

相关硕士学位论文 前2条

1 许晓俊;国际商事调解协议与和解协议法律效力问题研究[D];安徽大学;2011年

2 周易;国际商事领域的ADR方法研究[D];中国政法大学;2007年



本文编号:2237170

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/sflw/2237170.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户25ca2***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com